Suppr超能文献

唇腭裂手术的发展历程以及对标准化治疗方案达成共识的探索。

Evolution of Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery and the Pursuit for Consensus on Standardized Algorithms of Care.

作者信息

Naidu Priyanka, Plonkowski Alexander T, Yao Caroline A, Magee William P

机构信息

From the Operation Smile Incorporated, Virginia Beach, VA.

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Mar 20;13(3):e6643. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006643. eCollection 2025 Mar.

Abstract

Cleft lip and palate (CLP) surgery has evolved over centuries in an attempt to achieve anatomical closure while optimizing speech and limiting fistulas and midface hypoplasia. Masters of cleft surgery and early pioneers inspired generations of surgical innovators to refine techniques and timing to improve surgical outcomes. Constant modification has resulted in significant diversity of cleft surgical protocols across institutions. Unlike many other surgical conditions, there is no gold-standard algorithm of care for CLP. Several international consortiums, including Eurocleft, Americleft, and Scandcleft, aimed to investigate the ideal cleft care protocol. Despite the inclusion of multiple institutions and attempts at long-term follow-up, these studies were limited by small sample sizes, lack of diversity in patient population, poor long-term follow-up, lack of standardized measurement tools, and inability to control for confounders such as severity. This article aimed to present the findings of these early pioneer consortiums in their pursuit for the optimal CLP surgical protocol and recommend a direction for future research with a global consortium of experts in cleft care.

摘要

唇腭裂(CLP)手术历经数百年发展,旨在实现解剖学上的闭合,同时优化语音功能,并减少瘘管形成和面部中部发育不全。腭裂手术大师及早期先驱激励了一代又一代的外科创新者改进技术和手术时机,以改善手术效果。持续的改进导致各机构之间的腭裂手术方案存在显著差异。与许多其他外科疾病不同,唇腭裂不存在护理的金标准算法。包括欧洲腭裂研究组(Eurocleft)、美国腭裂研究组(Americleft)和斯堪的纳维亚腭裂研究组(Scandcleft)在内的几个国际联盟,旨在研究理想的腭裂护理方案。尽管纳入了多个机构并尝试进行长期随访,但这些研究受到样本量小、患者群体缺乏多样性、长期随访不佳、缺乏标准化测量工具以及无法控制诸如严重程度等混杂因素的限制。本文旨在介绍这些早期先驱联盟在寻求最佳唇腭裂手术方案方面的研究结果,并为未来与全球腭裂护理专家联盟开展的研究推荐一个方向。

相似文献

2
A Summary of the Existing Data on Cleft Surgical Outcomes: What Do We Not Know?唇腭裂手术结果的现有数据总结:我们还不知道什么?
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Apr 4;13(4):e6660. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006660. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Cleft Palate Repair: A History of Techniques and Variations.腭裂修复术:技术与变体的历史
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Mar 28;10(3):e4019. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004019. eCollection 2022 Mar.
10
The Effects of Gingivoperiosteoplasty and Cleft Palate Repair on Facial Growth.牙龈骨膜成形术和腭裂修复对面部生长的影响。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2024 May 1;153(5):1110-1119. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000010681. Epub 2023 May 15.

本文引用的文献

1
An essential overview of orofacial clefting.口腔颌面裂的基本概述。
Br Dent J. 2023 Jun;234(12):937-942. doi: 10.1038/s41415-023-6000-9. Epub 2023 Jun 23.
2
Early Cleft Lip Repair: Demonstrating Efficacy in the First 100 Patients.早期唇裂修复:100 例患者疗效验证。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Nov 1;150(5):1073-1080. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009634. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
4
Cleft Palate Repair: A History of Techniques and Variations.腭裂修复术:技术与变体的历史
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Mar 28;10(3):e4019. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004019. eCollection 2022 Mar.
6
Orofacial clefts embryology, classification, epidemiology, and genetics.口面裂的胚胎学、分类、流行病学和遗传学。
Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2021 Jan-Jun;787:108373. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2021.108373. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
7
The Evolution of Unilateral Cleft Lip Repair.单侧唇裂修复术的演变。
J Craniofac Surg. 2021 Sep 1;32(6):2068-2073. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000007635.
9
Foundation-Based Cleft Care in Developing Countries.发展中国家的以基金会为基础的腭裂护理。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Apr;143(4):1165-1178. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000005416.
10
Orthognathic Surgery for Patients with Cleft Lip and Palate.唇腭裂患者的正颌外科手术
Clin Plast Surg. 2019 Apr;46(2):157-171. doi: 10.1016/j.cps.2018.11.002. Epub 2019 Feb 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验