Diamond Kevin R, Farrell Thomas J, Patterson Michael S
Department of Medical Physics, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University, 699 Concession Street, Hamilton, Ontario L8V 5C2, Canada.
Phys Med Biol. 2003 Dec 21;48(24):4135-49. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/48/24/011.
Steady-state diffusion theory models of fluorescence in tissue have been investigated for recovering fluorophore concentrations and fluorescence quantum yield. Spatially resolved fluorescence, excitation and emission reflectance Carlo simulations, and measured using a multi-fibre probe on tissue-simulating phantoms containing either aluminium phthalocyanine tetrasulfonate (AlPcS4), Photofrin meso-tetra-(4-sulfonatophenyl)-porphine dihydrochloride The accuracy of the fluorophore concentration and fluorescence quantum yield recovered by three different models of spatially resolved fluorescence were compared. The models were based on: (a) weighted difference of the excitation and emission reflectance, (b) fluorescence due to a point excitation source or (c) fluorescence due to a pencil beam excitation source. When literature values for the fluorescence quantum yield were used for each of the fluorophores, the fluorophore absorption coefficient (and hence concentration) at the excitation wavelength (mu(a,x,f)) was recovered with a root-mean-square accuracy of 11.4% using the point source model of fluorescence and 8.0% using the more complicated pencil beam excitation model. The accuracy was calculated over a broad range of optical properties and fluorophore concentrations. The weighted difference of reflectance model performed poorly, with a root-mean-square error in concentration of about 50%. Monte Carlo simulations suggest that there are some situations where the weighted difference of reflectance is as accurate as the other two models, although this was not confirmed experimentally. Estimates of the fluorescence quantum yield in multiple scattering media were also made by determining mu(a,x,f) independently from the fitted absorption spectrum and applying the various diffusion theory models. The fluorescence quantum yields for AlPcS4 and TPPS4 were calculated to be 0.59 +/- 0.03 and 0.121 +/- 0.001 respectively using the point source model, and 0.63 +/- 0.03 and 0.129 +/- 0.002 using the pencil beam excitation model. These results are consistent with published values.
为了恢复荧光团浓度和荧光量子产率,人们对组织中荧光的稳态扩散理论模型进行了研究。利用空间分辨荧光、激发和发射反射率的蒙特卡罗模拟,并使用多纤维探头对含有四磺酸铝酞菁(AlPcS4)、二氢氯化中-四-(4-磺基苯基)-卟吩(光敏素)的组织模拟体模进行测量。比较了通过三种不同的空间分辨荧光模型恢复的荧光团浓度和荧光量子产率的准确性。这些模型基于:(a)激发和发射反射率的加权差,(b)点激发源产生的荧光,或(c)笔形光束激发源产生的荧光。当将每种荧光团的荧光量子产率文献值用于计算时,使用荧光点源模型恢复激发波长下的荧光团吸收系数(进而浓度)(μ(a,x,f))的均方根精度为11.4%,而使用更复杂的笔形光束激发模型时为8.0%。该精度是在广泛的光学性质和荧光团浓度范围内计算得出的。反射率加权差模型表现不佳,浓度的均方根误差约为50%。蒙特卡罗模拟表明,在某些情况下,反射率加权差与其他两种模型的准确性相当,尽管这一点未得到实验证实。通过从拟合吸收光谱中独立确定μ(a,x,f)并应用各种扩散理论模型,还对多重散射介质中的荧光量子产率进行了估计。使用点源模型计算得出AlPcS4和TPPS4的荧光量子产率分别为0.59±0.03和0.121±0.001,使用笔形光束激发模型时分别为0.63±0.03和0.129±0.002。这些结果与已发表的值一致。