Gilbert Gregg H, Duncan R Paul, Shelton Brent J
Department of Diagnostic Sciences, University of Alabama School of Dentistry, Birmingham 35294-0007, USA.
Health Serv Res. 2003 Dec;38(6 Pt 2):1843-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2003.00205.x.
To quantify racial and socioeconomic status (SES) disparities in oral health, as measured by tooth loss, and to determine the role of dental care use and other factors in explaining disparities.
DATA SOURCES/STUDY SETTING: The Florida Dental Care Study, comprising African Americans (AAs) and non-Hispanic whites 45 years old or older who had at least one tooth.
We used a prospective cohort design. Relevant population characteristics were grouped by predisposing, enabling, and need variables. The key outcome was tooth loss, a leading measure of a population's oral health, looked at before and after entering the dental care system. Tooth-specific data were used to increase inferential power by relating the loss of individual teeth to the disease level on those teeth.
In-person interviews and clinical examinations were done at baseline, 24, and 48 months, with telephone interviews every 6 months.
African Americans and persons of lower SES reported more new dental symptoms, but were less likely to obtain dental care. When they did receive care, they were more likely to experience tooth loss and less likely to report that dentists had discussed alternative treatments with them. At the first stage of analysis, differences in disease severity and new symptoms explained tooth loss disparities. Racial and SES differences in attitudes toward tooth loss and dental care were not contributory. Because almost all tooth loss occurs by means of dental extraction, the total effects of race and SES on tooth loss were artificially minimized unless disparities in dental care use were taken into account.
Race and SES are strong determinants of tooth loss. African Americans and lower SES persons had fewer teeth at baseline and still lost more teeth after baseline. Tooth-specific case-mix adjustment appears, statistically, to explain social disparity variation in tooth loss. However, when social disparities in dental care use are taken into account, social disparities in tooth loss that are not directly due to clinical circumstance become evident. This is because AAs and lower SES persons are more likely to receive a dental extraction once they enter the dental care system, given the same disease extent and severity. This phenomenon underscores the importance of understanding how disparities in health care use, dental insurance coverage, and service receipt contribute to disparities in health. Absent such understanding, the total effects of race and SES on health can be underestimated.
通过牙齿缺失情况量化口腔健康方面的种族差异和社会经济地位(SES)差异,并确定使用牙科护理及其他因素在解释这些差异中所起的作用。
数据来源/研究背景:佛罗里达牙科护理研究,研究对象为年龄在45岁及以上、至少有一颗牙齿的非裔美国人(AA)和非西班牙裔白人。
我们采用前瞻性队列设计。相关人群特征按易感性、促成因素和需求变量进行分组。关键结局是牙齿缺失,这是衡量人群口腔健康的一项主要指标,在进入牙科护理系统前后进行观察。使用特定牙齿的数据,通过将个别牙齿的缺失与这些牙齿的疾病程度相关联来提高推断能力。
在基线、24个月和48个月时进行面对面访谈和临床检查,每6个月进行一次电话访谈。
非裔美国人和社会经济地位较低的人报告有更多新的牙齿症状,但获得牙科护理的可能性较小。当他们确实接受护理时,他们更有可能出现牙齿缺失,并且不太可能报告牙医与他们讨论过替代治疗方法。在分析的第一阶段,疾病严重程度和新症状的差异解释了牙齿缺失的差异。在对牙齿缺失和牙科护理的态度上,种族和社会经济地位差异并无影响。由于几乎所有的牙齿缺失都是通过拔牙发生的,除非考虑到牙科护理使用方面的差异,否则种族和社会经济地位对牙齿缺失的总体影响会被人为地最小化。
种族和社会经济地位是牙齿缺失的重要决定因素。非裔美国人和社会经济地位较低的人在基线时牙齿较少,基线后仍然失去更多牙齿。从统计学上看,特定牙齿的病例组合调整似乎可以解释牙齿缺失方面的社会差异变化。然而,当考虑到牙科护理使用方面的社会差异时,并非直接由临床情况导致的牙齿缺失方面的社会差异就变得明显了。这是因为在相同的疾病范围和严重程度下,非裔美国人和社会经济地位较低的人一旦进入牙科护理系统,更有可能接受拔牙治疗。这种现象凸显了理解医疗保健使用、牙科保险覆盖范围和服务接受方面的差异如何导致健康差异的重要性。如果缺乏这种理解,种族和社会经济地位对健康的总体影响可能会被低估。