哪些新知识能帮助政策制定者更好地平衡投资以实现最佳健康结果？
What new knowledge would help policymakers better balance investments for optimal health outcomes?
作者信息
Kindig David, Day Patricia, Fox Daniel M, Gibson Mark, Knickman James, Lomas Jonathan, Stoddart Gregory
机构信息
Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin Medical School, Madison 53726-2397, USA.
出版信息
Health Serv Res. 2003 Dec;38(6 Pt 2):1923-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2003.00209.x.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE
Review the limitations in cross-sectoral health outcomes research and suggest a future research agenda. DATA SOURCES, STUDY DESIGN, DATA COLLECTION: Literature review and workshop discussion.
PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
The research evidence that would aid public and private policy makers in answering the question the title poses is quite limited.
CONCLUSIONS
Much more evidence from diverse disciplines is needed, and key areas are suggested. Criteria for progress by 2010 are proposed.
摘要
目的
回顾跨部门健康结果研究中的局限性，并提出未来的研究议程。数据来源、研究设计、数据收集：文献综述和研讨会讨论。
主要发现
有助于公共和私营部门政策制定者回答本文标题所提出问题的研究证据相当有限。
结论
需要来自不同学科的更多证据，并提出了关键领域。提出了到2010年取得进展的标准。
相似文献
1
What new knowledge would help policymakers better balance investments for optimal health outcomes?哪些新知识能帮助政策制定者更好地平衡投资以实现最佳健康结果？
Health Serv Res. 2003 Dec;38(6 Pt 2):1923-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2003.00209.x.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树：影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
The discordance between evidence and health policy in the United States: the science of translational research and the critical role of diverse stakeholders.美国证据与卫生政策之间的差异：转化研究的科学和多元化利益相关者的关键作用。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Aug 16;16(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0336-7.
4
Developing a decision aid to guide public sector health policy decisions: a study protocol.制定决策辅助工具以指导公共部门卫生政策决策：研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2011 May 10;6:46. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-46.
5
Use of a knowledge broker to establish healthy public policies in a city district: a developmental evaluation.利用知识中介在一个城区制定健康公共政策：一项发展性评估。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Mar 15;16:271. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-2832-4.
6
Factors affecting engagement between academic faculty and decision-makers: learnings and priorities for a school of public health.影响学术教师与决策者参与的因素：公共卫生学院的经验教训和优先事项。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 25;16(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0342-9.
7
Research glut and information famine: making research evidence more useful for policymakers.研究过剩与信息匮乏：让研究证据对政策制定者更有用
Health Aff (Millwood). 2008 Jul-Aug;27(4):1177-82. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.27.4.1177.
8
Do evidence summaries increase health policy-makers' use of evidence from systematic reviews? A systematic review.证据总结能否增加卫生政策制定者对系统评价证据的使用？一项系统评价。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Sep 10;14(1):1-52. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.8. eCollection 2018.
9
How is the use of research evidence in health policy perceived? A comparison between the reporting of researchers and policy-makers.研究证据在卫生政策中的应用是如何被感知的？研究人员和政策制定者报告的比较。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 20;16(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0345-6.
10
Fostering access to and use of contextualised knowledge to support health policy-making: lessons from the Policy Information Platform in Nigeria.促进获取和使用情境化知识以支持卫生决策制定：来自尼日利亚政策信息平台的经验教训。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Apr 8;17(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0431-4.
引用本文的文献
1
Converting the existing disease surveillance from a paper-based to an electronic-based system using district health information system (DHIS-2) for real-time information: the Lebanese experience.利用地区卫生信息系统（DHIS-2）将现有的基于纸质的疾病监测系统转换为基于电子的系统，以实时获取信息：黎巴嫩的经验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Mar 25;22(1):395. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07773-1.
2
Identifying health policy and systems research priorities on multisectoral collaboration for health in low-income and middle-income countries.确定低收入和中等收入国家卫生领域多部门合作的卫生政策与系统研究重点。
BMJ Glob Health. 2018 Oct 10;3(Suppl 4):e000970. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000970. eCollection 2018.
3
Population Health Could Do Far More to Mitigate Health Disparities.
Popul Health Manag. 2019 Apr;22(2):96-98. doi: 10.1089/pop.2018.0042. Epub 2018 May 14.
4
Helping health service researchers and policy makers speak the same language.助力卫生服务研究人员和政策制定者达成共识。
Health Serv Res. 2015 Feb;50(1):1-11. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12198. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
5
Development and psychometric evaluation of the public health surveillance well-being scale.公众健康监测幸福感量表的编制及心理测量学评价。
Qual Life Res. 2012 Aug;21(6):1031-43. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0002-9. Epub 2011 Sep 23.
6
Identifying the impact of social determinants of health on disease rates using correlation analysis of area-based summary information.利用基于区域的汇总信息的相关分析来确定健康的社会决定因素对疾病发生率的影响。
Public Health Rep. 2011 Sep-Oct;126 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):70-80. doi: 10.1177/00333549111260S312.
7
Collection of social determinant of health measures in U.S. national surveillance systems for HIV, viral hepatitis, STDs, and TB.收集美国国家艾滋病毒、病毒性肝炎、性传播疾病和结核病监测系统中的社会决定因素健康措施。
Public Health Rep. 2011 Sep-Oct;126 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):41-53. doi: 10.1177/00333549111260S309.
8
New Jersey's efforts to improve postpartum depression care did not change treatment patterns for women on medicaid.新泽西州改善产后抑郁症护理的努力并没有改变医疗补助计划妇女的治疗模式。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Feb;30(2):293-301. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.1075.
9
Population health rankings as policy indicators and performance measures.人群健康排名作为政策指标和绩效评估手段。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Sep;7(5):A101. Epub 2010 Aug 15.
10
Measuring the impact of public health policy.衡量公共卫生政策的影响。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Jul;7(4):A77. Epub 2010 Jun 15.
本文引用的文献
1
Opioid abuse in the United States and Department of Health and Human Services actions to address opioid-drug-related overdoses and deaths.美国的阿片类药物滥用情况以及美国卫生与公众服务部为应对与阿片类药物相关的过量用药和死亡所采取的行动。
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2015 Jun;29(2):133-9. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2015.1037530.
2
Employers' benefits from workers' health insurance.雇主从员工健康保险中获得的福利。
Milbank Q. 2003;81(1):5-43, table of contents. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00037.
3
Do Canadian civil servants care about the health of populations?加拿大公务员关心民众的健康吗？
Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):658-63. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.4.658.
4
Consuming research, producing policy?进行研究，制定政策？
Am J Public Health. 2003 Mar;93(3):371-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.3.371.
5
Examining the role of health services research in public policymaking.审视卫生服务研究在公共政策制定中的作用。
Milbank Q. 2002;80(1):125-54. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00005.
6
What the federal government can do about the nonmedical determinants of health.联邦政府在健康的非医学决定因素方面能做些什么。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Mar-Apr;21(2):94-106. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.94.
7
The case for more active policy attention to health promotion.需要更加积极的政策关注健康促进的理由。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Mar-Apr;21(2):78-93. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.78.
8
Incorporating socioeconomic factors into U.S. health policy: addressing the barriers.将社会经济因素纳入美国卫生政策：应对障碍
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Mar-Apr;21(2):113-8. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.113.
9
Ideas at the margin or marginalized ideas? Nonmedical determinants of health in Canada.边缘想法还是被边缘化的想法？加拿大健康的非医学决定因素。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2002 Mar-Apr;21(2):107-12. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.21.2.107.
10
What determines health? To where should we shift resources? Attitudes towards the determinants of health among multiple stakeholder groups in Prince Edward Island, Canada.
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Dec;53(12):1611-9. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(00)00445-7.
Zotero 插件