人群健康排名作为政策指标和绩效评估手段。
Population health rankings as policy indicators and performance measures.
机构信息
University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute, Madison, WI 53726, USA.
出版信息
Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Sep;7(5):A101. Epub 2010 Aug 15.
Abstract
Population health rankings can be used by various actors for different purposes. This article examines those potential uses and concludes that the chief promise of population health rankings lies in 2 areas. The first is to help set agendas - stimulating awareness, motivation, and debate over means to improved health outcomes. The second is to help establish broad responsibility for population health and the need for multisectoral collaboration to improve outcomes. A new performance regime based on rankings will require more research to establish causal pathways and relative determinants of health, as well as stronger evidence about the effects of public and private interventions to guide investment strategies. Finally, leaders who develop and promote population health rankings must further develop the technical community needed to translate the response to the rankings into constructive public debate and policy development.
摘要
人口健康排名可以被不同的利益相关者用于不同的目的。本文探讨了这些潜在用途，并得出结论，人口健康排名的主要意义在于两个方面。一是帮助确定议程——提高健康结果的意识、动机和辩论。二是帮助确定对人口健康的广泛责任以及需要多部门合作来改善结果。基于排名的新绩效制度将需要更多的研究来确定健康的因果途径和相对决定因素，以及更有力的公共和私人干预措施效果的证据，以指导投资策略。最后，制定和推广人口健康排名的领导人必须进一步发展技术社区，将对排名的反应转化为建设性的公众辩论和政策制定。
相似文献
1
Population health rankings as policy indicators and performance measures.人群健康排名作为政策指标和绩效评估手段。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2010 Sep;7(5):A101. Epub 2010 Aug 15.
2
Implementing and using quality measures for children's health care: perspectives on the state of the practice.实施和使用儿童保健质量指标：实践现状透视
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 2):217-27.
3
Uses of Population Health Rankings in Local Policy Contexts: A Multisite Case Study.人口健康排名在地方政策环境中的应用：一项多地点案例研究。
Med Care Res Rev. 2019 Aug;76(4):478-496. doi: 10.1177/1077558717726115. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
4
Establishing health care performance standards in an era of consumerism.
JAMA. 2001 Sep 12;286(10):1213-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.10.1213.
5
Use and Perceived Impact of the County Health Rankings Report in Florida and North Carolina.佛罗里达州和北卡罗来纳州《县健康排名报告》的使用情况及感知影响
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2016 Nov-Dec;22(6):E1-7. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000320.
6
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
7
Improving the quality of workers' compensation health care delivery: the Washington State Occupational Health Services Project.提高工伤赔偿医疗服务质量：华盛顿州职业健康服务项目。
Milbank Q. 2001;79(1):5-33. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00194.
8
Synergies between veterinarians and para-professionals in the public and private sectors: organisational and institutional relationships that facilitate the process of privatising animal health services in developing countries.公共和私营部门兽医与辅助专业人员之间的协同作用：促进发展中国家动物卫生服务私有化进程的组织和机构关系。
Rev Sci Tech. 2004 Apr;23(1):115-35; discussion 391-401. doi: 10.20506/rst.23.1.1472.
9
10
Developing quality indicators for local health departments: experience in Los Angeles County.
Am J Prev Med. 2003 Nov;25(4):347-57. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(03)00208-3.
引用本文的文献
1
Design of the performance outcome scoring template (POS-T) with example application on CO emissions reduction amongst 36 OECD member countries.具有绩效结果评分模板（POS-T）的设计，并以 36 个经合组织成员国的 CO2 减排为例的应用。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 15;12(1):4404. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-08368-w.
2
The contribution of benchmarking to quality improvement in healthcare. A systematic literature review.标杆管理在医疗质量改进中的作用。系统文献回顾。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 2;22(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07467-8.
3
Does Being "First" Matter?: Thoughts on Ranking, Health and Public Policy.成为“第一”重要吗？：关于排名、健康与公共政策的思考
Dela J Public Health. 2019 Dec 18;5(5):48-50. doi: 10.32481/djph.2019.12.013. eCollection 2019 Dec.
4
Proximity to Oil Refineries and Risk of Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.靠近炼油厂与癌症风险：一项基于人群的分析。
JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2020 Oct 7;4(6):pkaa088. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkaa088. eCollection 2020 Dec.
5
Towards precision public health: Geospatial analytics and sensitivity/specificity assessments to inform liver cancer prevention.迈向精准公共卫生：用于为肝癌预防提供信息的地理空间分析及敏感性/特异性评估
SSM Popul Health. 2020 Aug 7;12:100640. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2020.100640. eCollection 2020 Dec.
6
Comparing percentages and ranks of adolescent weight-related outcomes among U.S. states: Implications for intervention development.比较美国各州青少年体重相关结果的百分比和排名：对干预措施制定的启示。
Prev Med. 2017 Dec;105:109-115. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.09.006. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
7
Ranking States on Coverage of Cancer-Preventing Vaccines Among Adolescents: The Influence of Imprecision.青少年癌症预防疫苗接种覆盖率的州排名：不精确性的影响。
Public Health Rep. 2017 Nov/Dec;132(6):627-636. doi: 10.1177/0033354917727274. Epub 2017 Aug 30.
8
The County Health Rankings: rationale and methods.《县健康排名：原理与方法》
Popul Health Metr. 2015 Apr 17;13:11. doi: 10.1186/s12963-015-0044-2. eCollection 2015.
9
How reliable are county and regional health rankings?县级和地区级卫生排名的可信度如何？
Prev Sci. 2013 Oct;14(5):497-502. doi: 10.1007/s11121-012-0320-3.
10
The challenge of attribution: responsibility for population health in the context of accountable care.归因的挑战：在 accountable care 背景下的人群健康责任
Am J Prev Med. 2012 Jun;42(6 Suppl 2):S180-3. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.03.012.
本文引用的文献
1
Using the Wisconsin County Health Rankings to catalyze community health improvement.利用威斯康星州县域健康排名促进社区健康改善。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2009 Jan-Feb;15(1):24-32. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181903bf8.
2
Health plan performance measurement: does it affect quality of care for Medicare managed care enrollees?健康计划绩效评估：它会影响医疗保险管理式医疗参保人的医疗质量吗？
Inquiry. 2008 Summer;45(2):168-83. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_45.02.168.
3
The determinants of policy for population health.人口健康政策的决定因素。
Health Econ Policy Law. 2006 Oct;1(Pt 4):395-407. doi: 10.1017/S1744133106006037.
4
What can we say about the impact of public reporting? Inconsistent execution yields variable results.关于公开报告的影响我们能说些什么呢？执行不一致会产生不同的结果。
Ann Intern Med. 2008 Jan 15;148(2):160-1. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-2-200801150-00011.
5
Ranking community health status to stimulate discussion of local public health issues: the Wisconsin County Health Rankings.对社区健康状况进行排名以激发对当地公共卫生问题的讨论：威斯康星州县域健康排名。
Am J Public Health. 2008 Feb;98(2):209-12. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.092981. Epub 2008 Jan 2.
6
A pay-for-population health performance system.一种按人群健康绩效付费的体系。
JAMA. 2006 Dec 6;296(21):2611-3. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.21.2611.
7
Hospital performance reports: impact on quality, market share, and reputation.医院绩效报告：对质量、市场份额和声誉的影响。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jul-Aug;24(4):1150-60. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.4.1150.
8
What new knowledge would help policymakers better balance investments for optimal health outcomes?哪些新知识能帮助政策制定者更好地平衡投资以实现最佳健康结果？
Health Serv Res. 2003 Dec;38(6 Pt 2):1923-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2003.00209.x.
Zotero 插件