• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机对照试验中评估结直肠癌患者健康相关生活质量的方法学问题。

Methodological issues in assessing health-related quality of life of colorectal cancer patients in randomised controlled trials.

作者信息

Efficace F, Bottomley A, Vanvoorden V, Blazeby J M

机构信息

European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, EORTC Data Center, Quality of Life Unit, Avenue E. Mounier, 83, 1200 Brussels, Belgium.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2004 Jan;40(2):187-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2003.10.012.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2003.10.012
PMID:14728932
Abstract

Although health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is increasingly reported as an important endpoint in cancer clinical trials, questions still remain about the quality of its reporting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the level of reporting of HRQOL in randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of colorectal cancer (CRC). A systematic literature search from 1980 to March 2003 was undertaken on a number of databases. Identified eligible studies were selected and then evaluated on a broad set of HRQOL predetermined criteria by four reviewers. Thirty-one randomised controlled trials involving 9683 colorectal cancer patients were identified. Nearly all studies dealt with metastatic patients and principally compared different chemotherapy regimens. The HRQOL tool most often used was the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30), which was used in 48% of the studies. Some methodological limitations were identified: 39% of the RCTs did not report HRQOL compliance at baseline and 52% did not give details on missing data. A rationale for using a specific HRQOL measure was given in only 10% of the studies. Whilst HRQOL assessment is a potential valuable source of information in understanding the impact of colorectal cancer, a number of methodological shortcomings have to be further addressed in future studies.

摘要

尽管与健康相关的生活质量(HRQOL)越来越多地被报告为癌症临床试验中的一个重要终点,但关于其报告质量的问题仍然存在。本研究的目的是评估结直肠癌(CRC)随机对照试验(RCT)中HRQOL的报告水平。对多个数据库进行了1980年至2003年3月的系统文献检索。选择已确定的符合条件的研究,然后由四位评审员根据一系列预先确定的HRQOL标准进行评估。确定了31项涉及9683名结直肠癌患者的随机对照试验。几乎所有研究都涉及转移性患者,主要比较了不同的化疗方案。最常使用的HRQOL工具是欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心30(EORTC QLQ-C30),48%的研究使用了该工具。发现了一些方法学上的局限性:39%的RCT未报告基线时的HRQOL依从性,52%未详细说明缺失数据。只有10%的研究给出了使用特定HRQOL测量方法的理由。虽然HRQOL评估是了解结直肠癌影响的潜在有价值的信息来源,但未来的研究必须进一步解决一些方法学上的缺陷。

相似文献

1
Methodological issues in assessing health-related quality of life of colorectal cancer patients in randomised controlled trials.随机对照试验中评估结直肠癌患者健康相关生活质量的方法学问题。
Eur J Cancer. 2004 Jan;40(2):187-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2003.10.012.
2
Health related quality of life in prostate carcinoma patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.前列腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量:随机对照试验的系统评价
Cancer. 2003 Jan 15;97(2):377-88. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11065.
3
Reporting of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) data in oncology trials: a comparison of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G).报告肿瘤学试验中的健康相关生活质量 (HRQOL) 数据:欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心 30 项 (EORTC QLQ-C30) 与癌症治疗功能评估一般量表 (FACT-G) 的比较。
Qual Life Res. 2014 Apr;23(3):971-6. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0534-2. Epub 2013 Oct 5.
4
Reporting on quality of life in randomised controlled trials in gastrointestinal surgery.胃肠外科随机对照试验中生活质量报告。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Jan;14(1):156-65. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-1052-y. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
5
Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.早期乳腺癌患者的健康相关生活质量
Dan Med Bull. 2010 Sep;57(9):B4184.
6
Methodological and Reporting Quality of Comparative Studies Evaluating Health-Related Quality of Life of Colorectal Cancer Patients and Controls: A Systematic Review.评估结直肠癌患者及对照健康相关生活质量的比较研究的方法学和报告质量:一项系统评价
Dis Colon Rectum. 2016 Nov;59(11):1073-1086. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000618.
7
Systematic review recommends the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer colorectal cancer-specific module for measuring quality of life in colorectal cancer patients.系统评价推荐欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织结直肠癌特定模块用于测量结直肠癌患者的生活质量。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Mar;68(3):266-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.09.021. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
8
Health-related quality of life in non-small-cell lung cancer: methodologic issues in randomized controlled trials.非小细胞肺癌患者与健康相关的生活质量:随机对照试验中的方法学问题
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Aug 1;21(15):2982-92. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.01.203.
9
Quality, interpretation and presentation of European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30 data in randomised controlled trials.随机对照试验中欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷核心30数据的质量、解读与呈现
Eur J Cancer. 2008 Sep;44(13):1793-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.05.008. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
10
Health-related quality of life in locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer: methodological and clinical issues in randomised controlled trials.局部晚期和转移性乳腺癌的健康相关生活质量:随机对照试验中的方法学和临床问题。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17(7):e294-e304. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30099-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Coping Styles and Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Radiotherapy.接受放疗的乳腺癌患者的应对方式与生活质量
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Nov 22;15(23):5515. doi: 10.3390/cancers15235515.
2
Health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer in the palliative phase: a systematic review and meta-analysis.晚期结直肠癌患者的健康相关生活质量:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Sep 16;20(1):144. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00837-9.
3
Comparing the use of patient-reported outcomes in clinical studies in Europe in 2008 and 2018: a literature review.
比较 2008 年和 2018 年在欧洲进行的临床研究中使用患者报告结局的情况:文献综述。
Qual Life Res. 2022 Mar;31(3):659-669. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02946-7. Epub 2021 Aug 4.
4
Patient Reported Outcomes Have Arrived: A Practical Overview for Clinicians in Using Patient Reported Outcomes in Oncology.患者报告结局已经到来:肿瘤学中使用患者报告结局的实用概述。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2019 Nov;94(11):2291-2301. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.04.005. Epub 2019 Sep 25.
5
Synthesis and summary of patient-reported outcome measures to inform the development of a core outcome set in colorectal cancer surgery.患者报告结局指标的综合与总结,以指导结直肠癌手术核心结局集的制定。
Colorectal Dis. 2015 Nov;17(11):O217-29. doi: 10.1111/codi.13021.
6
Patient-reported outcomes in randomised controlled trials of colorectal cancer: an analysis determining the availability of robust data to inform clinical decision-making.结直肠癌随机对照试验中的患者报告结局:一项确定用于为临床决策提供依据的可靠数据可用性的分析
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec;141(12):2181-92. doi: 10.1007/s00432-015-1970-x. Epub 2015 Apr 25.
7
How much do cancer-related symptoms contribute to health-related quality of life in lung and colorectal cancer patients? A report from the Cancer Care Outcomes Research and Surveillance (CanCORS) Consortium.癌症相关症状对肺癌和结直肠癌患者的健康相关生活质量有多大影响?癌症护理结果研究与监测(CanCORS)联盟的一份报告。
Cancer. 2015 Aug 15;121(16):2831-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29415. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
8
In reply.作为答复。
Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015 Jan 5;112(1-2):11-3. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0011b.
9
Overcoming barriers to the implementation of patient-reported outcomes in cancer clinical trials: the PROMOTION Registry.克服癌症临床试验中实施患者报告结局的障碍:PROMOTION 登记处。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Jun 6;12:86. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-12-86.
10
Patient-reported outcomes in randomised controlled trials of prostate cancer: methodological quality and impact on clinical decision making.前列腺癌随机对照试验中患者报告的结局:方法学质量及其对临床决策的影响。
Eur Urol. 2014 Sep;66(3):416-27. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.10.017. Epub 2013 Oct 30.