Zerahn B, Lausten G S, Kanstrup I-L
Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Int Orthop. 2004 Jun;28(3):146-50. doi: 10.1007/s00264-003-0534-x. Epub 2004 Jan 17.
We compared the differences in bone mineral density (BMD) adjacent to two biomechanically different cementless femoral stems (Spotorno and Evolution-K). Measurements were performed within the first week after surgery and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively in a prospective study of 31 patients with 37 total hip arthroplasties. A modified Harris hip score and a visual analogue score for patient satisfaction was used to evaluate the clinical outcome. For both stems, dual X-ray absorptiometry measurements revealed a decrease in BMD in Gruen zone 7. Patients with a Spotorno stem also had a significant decrease in BMD in zones 1 and 2. In patients with an Evolution-K stem, there was a positive correlation between the clinical outcome and BMD in Gruen zones 1 and 4. Our data suggest that periprosthetic bone loss is equal to if not less pronounced adjacent to the Evolution-K stem as compared to the Spotorno stem.
我们比较了两种生物力学不同的非骨水泥型股骨柄(Spotorno和Evolution-K)周围骨密度(BMD)的差异。在一项对31例患者进行37次全髋关节置换术的前瞻性研究中,于术后第一周以及术后3、6、12和24个月进行测量。采用改良Harris髋关节评分和患者满意度视觉模拟评分来评估临床结果。对于两种股骨柄,双能X线吸收法测量显示Gruen 7区骨密度降低。使用Spotorno股骨柄的患者在1区和2区骨密度也显著降低。对于使用Evolution-K股骨柄的患者,Gruen 1区和4区的临床结果与骨密度之间存在正相关。我们的数据表明,与Spotorno股骨柄相比,Evolution-K股骨柄周围的假体周围骨丢失即便没有更轻,至少也是相当的。