Douglas Kevin S, Ogloff James R
Department of Mental Health Law & Policy, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa 33612, USA.
Can J Psychiatry. 2003 Dec;48(11):734-40. doi: 10.1177/070674370304801105.
This study examined the impact of using various archival sources of violence data on the recorded base rate of violence and on the accuracy of violence risk assessments in a sample of civil psychiatric patients.
Violence in the community, after release from involuntary hospitalization, was measured with 3 types of archival data: criminal records, psychiatric hospital readmission records, and readmission records from multiple general hospitals.
Findings indicated that the different measurement sources each identified unique incidents of violence, which were correlated moderately or not at all with one another, and that the estimated base rate of violence varied substantially as a function of outcome source. Not surprisingly, using a combination of sources identified the highest base rate of violence. Predictive validity estimates also varied widely under different measurement procedures and were more stable when a combination of sources was used.
It is important in practical and research terms for studies of psychiatric patient violence to use multiple sources of outcome data.
本研究考察了使用各种暴力数据档案来源对民事精神病患者样本中暴力行为记录的基础发生率以及暴力风险评估准确性的影响。
通过3种档案数据衡量非自愿住院出院后社区中的暴力行为:犯罪记录、精神病医院再入院记录以及多家综合医院的再入院记录。
研究结果表明,不同的测量来源各自识别出了独特的暴力事件,这些事件彼此之间的相关性为中度或根本不相关,而且暴力行为的估计基础发生率根据结果来源的不同而有很大差异。不出所料,使用多种来源相结合的方式识别出的暴力基础发生率最高。在不同的测量程序下,预测效度估计值也有很大差异,而使用多种来源相结合的方式时则更稳定。
对于精神病患者暴力行为的研究而言,从实践和研究角度出发,使用多种结果数据来源非常重要。