• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性阻塞性肺疾病的肺康复:科学与政治议程

Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a scientific and political agenda.

作者信息

Fahy Bonnie F

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary Rehabilitation, St Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix, Arizona 85013, USA.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2004 Jan;49(1):28-36; discussion 36-8.

PMID:14733620
Abstract

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is the standard of care for patients suffering chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This report describes and defines PR and reviews the evidence regarding the efficacy of PR. COPD management guidelines that include PR have been published by the European Respiratory Society, the American Thoracic Society, and the British Thoracic Society, and those guidelines were supported by evidence-based guidelines published jointly by the American College of Chest Physicians and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease, which is also evidence-based, included the recommendation for referral to PR. Despite those recommendations, the availability of comprehensive PR programs (defined as being compliant with national practice standards) is limited. In the United States the lack of a national policy for PR reimbursement has led to differences in compensation among insurance providers, based on differences in the Local Medical Review Policies established by the "fiscal intermediaries." Since 1998 the American Association for Respiratory Care, the American College of Chest Physicians, the American Thoracic Society, and the National Association for Medical Direction of Respiratory Care have jointly lobbied for clear, consistent guidelines from the United States Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA, which was recently renamed the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS]). In 2002 new Medicare/Medicaid billing codes ("G codes") became available for billing PR procedures, but unfortunately the instructions for the use of those codes differ among the Local Medical Review Policies. There has been little success in the effort to establish a national coverage policy for PR. The respiratory therapist holds a unique role in PR. In the respiratory therapist's training curriculum PR is specifically addressed, making the respiratory therapist an asset to the multidisciplinary PR team. With their many clinical opportunities for making contact with COPD patients and physicians, respiratory therapists can be effective advocates for PR.

摘要

肺康复(PR)是慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的标准治疗方法。本报告描述并定义了肺康复,并回顾了有关肺康复疗效的证据。欧洲呼吸学会、美国胸科学会和英国胸科学会已发布了包含肺康复的COPD管理指南,这些指南得到了美国胸科医师学会和美国心血管与肺康复协会联合发布的循证指南的支持。同样基于循证的慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议也包括了推荐转诊至肺康复的内容。尽管有这些推荐,但全面的肺康复项目(定义为符合国家实践标准)的可及性有限。在美国,缺乏关于肺康复报销的国家政策导致了保险提供商之间在补偿方面的差异,这是基于“财务中介机构”制定的地方医疗审核政策的差异。自1998年以来,美国呼吸护理协会、美国胸科医师学会、美国胸科学会和国家呼吸护理医学指导协会联合游说美国医疗保健财务管理局(HCFA,最近更名为医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心[CMS])制定清晰、一致的指南。2002年,新的医疗保险/医疗补助计费代码(“G代码”)可用于肺康复程序计费,但不幸的是,这些代码的使用说明在地方医疗审核政策中各不相同。在努力制定肺康复的全国覆盖政策方面几乎没有取得成功。呼吸治疗师在肺康复中发挥着独特的作用。在呼吸治疗师的培训课程中专门涉及了肺康复内容,这使呼吸治疗师成为多学科肺康复团队的一项资产。凭借与COPD患者和医生接触的众多临床机会,呼吸治疗师可以成为肺康复的有效倡导者。

相似文献

1
Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a scientific and political agenda.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的肺康复:科学与政治议程
Respir Care. 2004 Jan;49(1):28-36; discussion 36-8.
2
Pulmonary rehabilitation: a focus on COPD in primary care.肺康复:以初级保健为重点的 COPD 管理。
Postgrad Med. 2009 Nov;121(6):140-7. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2009.11.2082.
3
Clinical practice guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a review and comparison of current resources.慢性阻塞性肺疾病临床实践指南:当前资源的综述与比较
Respir Care. 2006 Mar;51(3):277-88.
4
Pulmonary rehabilitation: summary of an evidence-based guideline.肺康复:循证指南概要
Respir Care. 2008 Sep;53(9):1203-7.
5
Pulmonary rehabilitation: an underutilized resource in primary COPD care.肺康复:在 COPD 初级治疗中未充分利用的资源。
Phys Sportsmed. 2010 Dec;38(4):54-60. doi: 10.3810/psm.2010.12.1825.
6
Pulmonary rehabilitation exercise prescription in chronic obstructive lung disease: US survey and review of guidelines and clinical practices.慢性阻塞性肺疾病肺康复运动处方:美国调查及对指南和临床实践的回顾。
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2013 Sep-Oct;33(5):314-22. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e318297fea4.
7
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.政策与实践:医疗和教育环境中处方治疗与耐用医疗设备的比较
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063.
8
The 2007 GOLD Guidelines: a comprehensive care framework.《2007年慢性阻塞性肺疾病全球倡议指南》:一个全面的护理框架。
Respir Care. 2009 Aug;54(8):1040-9.
9
Review of guidelines and the literature in the treatment of acute bronchospasm in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.慢性阻塞性肺疾病急性支气管痉挛治疗指南及文献综述
Pharmacotherapy. 2006 Sep;26(9 Pt 2):156S-63S. doi: 10.1592/phco.26.9part2.156S.
10
Pulmonary rehabilitation: WHAT WE KNOW AND WHAT WE NEED TO KNOW.肺康复:我们所知道的与我们需要知道的
J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev. 2009 May-Jun;29(3):141-51. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0b013e3181a85cda.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and Preliminary Evaluation of the Effects of an mHealth Web-Based Platform (HappyAir) on Adherence to a Maintenance Program After Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial.基于 mHealth 的网络平台(HappyAir)对 COPD 患者肺康复后维持治疗依从性的影响的开发和初步评价:随机对照试验
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 31;8(7):e18465. doi: 10.2196/18465.