Suppr超能文献

急救人员对轻伤单位进行分诊和直接转运的有效性评估结果。

Results of an evaluation of the effectiveness of triage and direct transportation to minor injuries units by ambulance crews.

作者信息

Snooks H, Foster T, Nicholl J

机构信息

Clinical School, University of Wales Swansea, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2004 Jan;21(1):105-11. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.009050.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate triage and transportation to a minor injury unit (MIU) by emergency ambulance crews.

METHODS

Ambulance crews in two services were asked to transport appropriate patients to MIU during randomly selected weeks of one year. During all other weeks they were to treat such patients according to normal practice. Patients were followed up through ambulance service, hospital and/or MIU records, and by postal questionnaire. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with crews (n = 15). Cases transferred from MIU to accident and emergency (A&E) were reviewed.

RESULTS

41 intervention cluster patients attended MIU, 303 attended A&E, 65 were not conveyed. Thirty seven control cluster patients attended MIU, 327 attended A&E, 61 stayed at scene. Because of low study design compliance, outcomes of patients taken to MIU were compared with those taken to A&E, adjusted for case mix. MIU patients were 7.2 times as likely to rate their care as excellent (95% CI 1.99 to 25.8). Ambulance service job-cycle time and time in unit were shorter for MIU patients (-7.8, 95% CI -11.5 to -4.1); (-222.7, 95%CI -331.9 to -123.5). Crews cited patient and operational factors as inhibiting MIU use; and location, service, patient choice, job-cycle time, and handover as encouraging their use. Of seven patients transferred by ambulance from MIU to A&E, medical reviewers judged that three had not met the protocol for conveyance to MIU. No patients were judged to have suffered adverse consequences.

CONCLUSIONS

MIUs were only used for a small proportion of eligible patients. When they were used, patients and the ambulance service benefited.

摘要

目的

评估急救救护车工作人员将患者分诊并转运至轻伤科室(MIU)的情况。

方法

要求两个急救服务部门的救护车工作人员在一年中随机选择的几周内,将合适的患者转运至MIU。在其他所有周内,他们应按照常规做法治疗此类患者。通过急救服务、医院和/或MIU记录以及邮政问卷调查对患者进行随访。对工作人员(n = 15)进行了半结构化访谈。对从MIU转至急诊(A&E)的病例进行了审查。

结果

41名干预组患者前往了MIU,303名前往了A&E,65名未被转运。37名对照组患者前往了MIU,327名前往了A&E,61名留在现场。由于研究设计的依从性较低,将前往MIU的患者的结果与前往A&E的患者的结果进行了比较,并根据病例组合进行了调整。MIU患者将其护理评为优秀的可能性是其他患者的7.2倍(95%置信区间1.99至25.8)。MIU患者的急救服务工作周期时间和在科室的时间更短(-7.8,95%置信区间-11.5至-4.1);(-222.7,95%置信区间-331.9至-123.5)。工作人员指出患者和操作因素阻碍了MIU的使用;而地点、服务、患者选择、工作周期时间和交接则促使他们使用MIU。在7名由救护车从MIU转至A&E的患者中,医学评审人员判定有3名不符合转运至MIU的标准。没有患者被判定遭受不良后果。

结论

MIU仅用于一小部分符合条件的患者。当使用MIU时,患者和急救服务部门均从中受益。

相似文献

2
Do ambulance crews triage trauma patients?急救人员会对创伤患者进行分诊吗?
Arch Emerg Med. 1991 Sep;8(3):185-91. doi: 10.1136/emj.8.3.185.

引用本文的文献

6
A review on ambulance offload delay literature.救护车下客延误文献综述。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2019 Dec;22(4):658-675. doi: 10.1007/s10729-018-9450-x. Epub 2018 Jul 7.

本文引用的文献

6
Appropriateness of use of emergency ambulances.急诊救护车的使用适宜性。
J Accid Emerg Med. 1998 Jul;15(4):212-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.15.4.212.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验