• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Results of an evaluation of the effectiveness of triage and direct transportation to minor injuries units by ambulance crews.急救人员对轻伤单位进行分诊和直接转运的有效性评估结果。
Emerg Med J. 2004 Jan;21(1):105-11. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.009050.
2
Do ambulance crews triage trauma patients?急救人员会对创伤患者进行分诊吗?
Arch Emerg Med. 1991 Sep;8(3):185-91. doi: 10.1136/emj.8.3.185.
3
On-scene alternatives for emergency ambulance crews attending patients who do not need to travel to the accident and emergency department: a review of the literature.针对无需前往急诊科的患者,现场急救医护人员的替代方案:文献综述
Emerg Med J. 2004 Mar;21(2):212-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.005199.
4
Why are people without medical needs transported by ambulance? A study of indications for pre-hospital care.为何无医疗需求的人会被救护车运送?一项关于院前护理指征的研究。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2007 Jun;14(3):151-6. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e3280146508.
5
Towards primary care for non-serious 999 callers: results of a controlled study of "Treat and Refer" protocols for ambulance crews.面向非重症999呼叫者的初级护理:一项针对救护人员“治疗与转诊”方案的对照研究结果
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Dec;13(6):435-43. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.6.435.
6
Gaps between policy, protocols and practice: a qualitative study of the views and practice of emergency ambulance staff concerning the care of patients with non-urgent needs.政策、协议与实践之间的差距:一项关于急救救护车工作人员对非紧急需求患者护理的观点与实践的定性研究
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Aug;14(4):251-7. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2004.012195.
7
Safety of telephone consultation for "non-serious" emergency ambulance service patients.“非重症”紧急救护服务患者电话咨询的安全性
Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13(5):363-73. doi: 10.1136/qhc.13.5.363.
8
Do ambulance crews with one advanced paramedic skills officer have longer scene times than crews with two?配备一名高级护理技能官的急救人员的现场停留时间会比配备两名的急救人员更长吗?
Emerg Med J. 2002 Mar;19(2):152-4. doi: 10.1136/emj.19.2.152.
9
Ambulance crew assessment of trauma severity and alerting practice for trauma patients brought to a general hospital.救护车工作人员对送至综合医院的创伤患者的创伤严重程度评估及警报实践。
Resuscitation. 2004 Mar;60(3):279-82. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2003.11.014.
10
Advancing age and trauma: triage destination compliance and mortality in Victoria, Australia.老龄化与创伤:澳大利亚维多利亚州的分诊目的地依从性与死亡率
Injury. 2014 Sep;45(9):1312-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2014.02.028. Epub 2014 Feb 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring prehospital emergency care challenges and interventions to reduce emergency department overcrowding: a qualitative meta-synthesis.探索院前急救挑战及减少急诊科过度拥挤的干预措施:一项定性元综合分析
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 12;15(8):e097457. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-097457.
2
Could low-acuity emergency medical services patients be redirected to primary care? Findings from a multi-center survey in Berlin, Germany.低 acuity 紧急医疗服务患者能否被转诊至初级保健机构?德国柏林一项多中心调查的结果。
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01295-9.
3
Adaptation of J-SPEED for the emergency department of a regional hospital in the Republic of Uzbekistan: retrospective analysis.J-SPEED在乌兹别克斯坦共和国一家地区医院急诊科的适应性调整:回顾性分析
BMC Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):113. doi: 10.1186/s12873-025-01272-2.
4
Alternatives to direct emergency department conveyance of ambulance patients: a scoping review of the evidence.救护车患者非直接送往急诊部的替代方案:证据范围综述。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2021 Jan 6;29(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00821-x.
5
Stakeholder opinion on the proposal to introduce 'treat and referral' into the Irish emergency medical service.利益相关者对在爱尔兰急救医疗服务中引入“治疗和转介”的建议的意见。
BMC Emerg Med. 2019 Dec 21;19(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12873-019-0295-5.
6
A review on ambulance offload delay literature.救护车下客延误文献综述。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2019 Dec;22(4):658-675. doi: 10.1007/s10729-018-9450-x. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
7
Referral pathways for patients with TIA avoiding hospital admission: a scoping review.短暂性脑缺血发作患者避免住院的转诊途径:一项范围综述
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 14;7(2):e013443. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013443.
8
Support and Assessment for Fall Emergency Referrals (SAFER 1): cluster randomised trial of computerised clinical decision support for paramedics.跌倒紧急转诊的支持与评估(SAFER 1):护理人员计算机化临床决策支持的整群随机试验
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 12;9(9):e106436. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0106436. eCollection 2014.
9
Non-emergency department interventions to reduce ED utilization: a systematic review.非急诊部门干预措施以减少急诊部门的利用:系统评价。
Acad Emerg Med. 2013 Oct;20(10):969-85. doi: 10.1111/acem.12219.
10
New models of emergency prehospital care that avoid unnecessary conveyance to emergency department: translation of research evidence into practice?避免不必要转运至急诊科的新型院前急救模式:研究证据转化为实践?
ScientificWorldJournal. 2013 Jun 2;2013:182102. doi: 10.1155/2013/182102. Print 2013.

本文引用的文献

1
NHS emergency response to 999 calls: alternatives for cases that are neither life threatening nor serious.英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)对999急救电话的应急响应:针对既非危及生命也不严重情况的替代方案。
BMJ. 2002 Aug 10;325(7359):330-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7359.330.
2
Feasibility of paramedic treatment and referral of minor illnesses and injuries.护理人员对轻症疾病和损伤进行治疗及转诊的可行性。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2001 Oct-Dec;5(4):371-8. doi: 10.1080/10903120190939535.
3
Study design and outcomes in out-of-hospital emergency medicine research: a ten-year analysis.院外急诊医学研究的研究设计与结果:十年分析
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2000 Apr-Jun;4(2):144-50. doi: 10.1080/10903120090941416.
4
Who calls 999 and why? A survey of the emergency workload of the London Ambulance Service.谁拨打999以及为何拨打?对伦敦救护车服务中心紧急工作量的一项调查。
J Accid Emerg Med. 1999 May;16(3):174-8. doi: 10.1136/emj.16.3.174.
5
Misuse of the London ambulance service: How much and why?伦敦救护车服务的滥用情况:程度如何?原因何在?
J Accid Emerg Med. 1998 Nov;15(6):368-70. doi: 10.1136/emj.15.6.368.
6
Appropriateness of use of emergency ambulances.急诊救护车的使用适宜性。
J Accid Emerg Med. 1998 Jul;15(4):212-5. doi: 10.1136/emj.15.4.212.
7
Is the emergency (999) service being misused? Retrospective analysis.紧急(999)服务是否被滥用?回顾性分析。
BMJ. 1998 Feb 7;316(7129):437-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7129.437.
8
Quantifying the scanty science of prehospital emergency care.量化院前急救护理领域稀缺的科学研究。
Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Dec;30(6):785-90. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70049-0.
9
Ambulance use, misuse, and unmet needs in a developing emergency medical services system.发展中的紧急医疗服务系统中的救护车使用、误用及未满足的需求。
Eur J Emerg Med. 1996 Jun;3(2):73-8. doi: 10.1097/00063110-199606000-00003.
10
A patient survey system to measure quality improvement: questionnaire reliability and validity.用于衡量质量改进的患者调查系统:问卷的信度和效度
Med Care. 1993 Sep;31(9):834-45. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199309000-00008.

急救人员对轻伤单位进行分诊和直接转运的有效性评估结果。

Results of an evaluation of the effectiveness of triage and direct transportation to minor injuries units by ambulance crews.

作者信息

Snooks H, Foster T, Nicholl J

机构信息

Clinical School, University of Wales Swansea, UK.

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2004 Jan;21(1):105-11. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.009050.

DOI:10.1136/emj.2003.009050
PMID:14734396
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1756342/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate triage and transportation to a minor injury unit (MIU) by emergency ambulance crews.

METHODS

Ambulance crews in two services were asked to transport appropriate patients to MIU during randomly selected weeks of one year. During all other weeks they were to treat such patients according to normal practice. Patients were followed up through ambulance service, hospital and/or MIU records, and by postal questionnaire. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with crews (n = 15). Cases transferred from MIU to accident and emergency (A&E) were reviewed.

RESULTS

41 intervention cluster patients attended MIU, 303 attended A&E, 65 were not conveyed. Thirty seven control cluster patients attended MIU, 327 attended A&E, 61 stayed at scene. Because of low study design compliance, outcomes of patients taken to MIU were compared with those taken to A&E, adjusted for case mix. MIU patients were 7.2 times as likely to rate their care as excellent (95% CI 1.99 to 25.8). Ambulance service job-cycle time and time in unit were shorter for MIU patients (-7.8, 95% CI -11.5 to -4.1); (-222.7, 95%CI -331.9 to -123.5). Crews cited patient and operational factors as inhibiting MIU use; and location, service, patient choice, job-cycle time, and handover as encouraging their use. Of seven patients transferred by ambulance from MIU to A&E, medical reviewers judged that three had not met the protocol for conveyance to MIU. No patients were judged to have suffered adverse consequences.

CONCLUSIONS

MIUs were only used for a small proportion of eligible patients. When they were used, patients and the ambulance service benefited.

摘要

目的

评估急救救护车工作人员将患者分诊并转运至轻伤科室(MIU)的情况。

方法

要求两个急救服务部门的救护车工作人员在一年中随机选择的几周内,将合适的患者转运至MIU。在其他所有周内,他们应按照常规做法治疗此类患者。通过急救服务、医院和/或MIU记录以及邮政问卷调查对患者进行随访。对工作人员(n = 15)进行了半结构化访谈。对从MIU转至急诊(A&E)的病例进行了审查。

结果

41名干预组患者前往了MIU,303名前往了A&E,65名未被转运。37名对照组患者前往了MIU,327名前往了A&E,61名留在现场。由于研究设计的依从性较低,将前往MIU的患者的结果与前往A&E的患者的结果进行了比较,并根据病例组合进行了调整。MIU患者将其护理评为优秀的可能性是其他患者的7.2倍(95%置信区间1.99至25.8)。MIU患者的急救服务工作周期时间和在科室的时间更短(-7.8,95%置信区间-11.5至-4.1);(-222.7,95%置信区间-331.9至-123.5)。工作人员指出患者和操作因素阻碍了MIU的使用;而地点、服务、患者选择、工作周期时间和交接则促使他们使用MIU。在7名由救护车从MIU转至A&E的患者中,医学评审人员判定有3名不符合转运至MIU的标准。没有患者被判定遭受不良后果。

结论

MIU仅用于一小部分符合条件的患者。当使用MIU时,患者和急救服务部门均从中受益。