Crystal Roger, Bleetman Anthony, Steyn Richard
Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Resuscitation. 2004 Mar;60(3):279-82. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2003.11.014.
Ambulance crews may alert hospitals for patients who are severely unwell. This allows the hospital time to prepare space and equipment, and to assemble an appropriate clinical team to receive and manage the patient immediately on arrival. Over and under alerting by ambulance crews is to be avoided to avoid complacency on one hand, and inadequate reception of severely injured patients on the other. There are currently no formal guidelines for the ambulance service to alert hospitals in appropriate cases.
To describe the current alerting practice for trauma patients by ambulance crews to a large urban hospital.
Details of each trauma alert for the hospital for the year 2000 were identified. The Injury Severity Score (ISS) was determined for all trauma patients who were eligible for inclusion into the Trauma Audit Research Network (TARN) for the same year. The two populations were compared.
There were 145 trauma patients for whom an alert was made during the year 2000, and there were 504 patients eligible for inclusion into TARN. Ten percent (49) of the TARN patients had an ISS > 15. Twenty-five percent (35/135) of the trauma patients with alerts had been entered into TARN. Seventy-five percent (100/135) of the trauma patients with alerts did not meet the criteria for inclusion into TARN. Forty-three percent (15/35) of the trauma patients with alerts who appeared in TARN had an ISS > 15 (11% of all trauma alerts). Thirty-four TARN-eligible patients with an ISS > 15 were not the subject of a hospital alert.
The majority of patients with major trauma (ISS > 15) were not the subject of a hospital alert by the ambulance service. Seventy-five percent of the patients who were the subject of an alert were not eligible for inclusion into TARN, implying that they did not have serious injury. Pre-hospital trauma severity assessment needs developing with appropriate ambulance protocols, to ensure appropriate alert calls.
救护车工作人员可能会为病情严重的患者通知医院。这使医院有时间准备空间和设备,并组建合适的临床团队,以便在患者到达时立即接收和处理。应避免救护车工作人员过度通知和通知不足,一方面是为了避免自满情绪,另一方面是为了避免重伤患者得不到充分的接待。目前尚无针对救护车服务在适当情况下通知医院的正式指南。
描述救护车工作人员向一家大型城市医院通报创伤患者的当前通知做法。
确定了该医院2000年每次创伤警报的详细信息。为同一年符合纳入创伤审计研究网络(TARN)条件的所有创伤患者确定了损伤严重程度评分(ISS)。对这两个人群进行了比较。
2000年有145名创伤患者收到了警报,有504名患者符合纳入TARN的条件。TARN患者中有10%(49名)的ISS>15。收到警报的创伤患者中有25%(35/135)被纳入TARN。收到警报的创伤患者中有75%(100/135)不符合纳入TARN的标准。出现在TARN中的收到警报的创伤患者中有43%(15/35)的ISS>15(占所有创伤警报的11%)。34名符合TARN条件且ISS>15的患者未收到医院警报。
大多数重伤患者(ISS>15)未收到救护车服务发出的医院警报。收到警报的患者中有75%不符合纳入TARN的条件,这意味着他们没有严重受伤。需要制定适当的救护车协议来开展院前创伤严重程度评估,以确保发出适当的警报呼叫。