Hayashi Hidenori, Sakamoto Mitsuo, Benno Yoshimi
Japan Collection of Microorganisms, RIKEN, Saitama, Japan.
Microbiol Immunol. 2004;48(1):1-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2004.tb03481.x.
The 27F forward primer is frequently used in 16S rRNA gene libraries and T-RFLP analysis. However, Bifidobacterium spp. were barely detected with this primer in human fecal samples. In this study, fecal microbiota were analyzed using the T-RFLP method with three different forward primers (27F, 35F, and 529F) in conjunction with one reverse primer (1492R). T-RFLP analysis of fecal microbiota using 35F and 529F detected higher proportions of the terminal restriction fragment (T-RF) corresponding to Bifidobacterium spp. than that using 27F. 27F is in imperfect agreement while 35F and 529F are in good concordance with the 16S rRNA gene sequences of Bifidobacterium spp., and the latter primers allowed for the detection of T-RFs of Bifidobacterium spp. in fecal samples from five healthy subjects. The T-RFs presumed to be Bifidobacterium spp. were cloned and sequenced, and found to match the 16S rRNA gene sequences of Bifidobacterium spp. Among the five fecal samples, two samples with low frequencies of T-RFs of Bifidobacterium spp. were detected using these forward primers. This probably reflects a low prevalence of Bifidobacterium spp. in these two samples. Our study emphasizes the importance of selecting a suitable forward primer for detection of Bifidobacterium spp.
27F正向引物常用于16S rRNA基因文库和末端限制性片段长度多态性(T-RFLP)分析。然而,在人类粪便样本中,使用该引物几乎检测不到双歧杆菌属。在本研究中,采用T-RFLP方法,结合三种不同的正向引物(27F、35F和529F)和一种反向引物(1492R)对粪便微生物群进行分析。与使用27F相比,使用35F和529F对粪便微生物群进行T-RFLP分析时,检测到的与双歧杆菌属相对应的末端限制性片段(T-RF)比例更高。27F与双歧杆菌属的16S rRNA基因序列不完全一致,而35F和529F与双歧杆菌属的16S rRNA基因序列一致性良好,后两种引物能够检测出五名健康受试者粪便样本中双歧杆菌属的T-RF。对推测为双歧杆菌属的T-RF进行克隆和测序,发现其与双歧杆菌属的16S rRNA基因序列匹配。在这五份粪便样本中,使用这些正向引物检测到两份双歧杆菌属T-RF频率较低的样本。这可能反映了这两份样本中双歧杆菌属的低流行率。我们的研究强调了选择合适的正向引物来检测双歧杆菌属的重要性。