• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜疝修补术和李金斯坦疝修补术的五年疗效

Five-year outcome of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernioplasties.

作者信息

Heikkinen T, Bringman S, Ohtonen P, Kunelius P, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, 90021 OYS, Oulu, PL 21, Finland.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2004 Mar;18(3):518-22. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9119-4. Epub 2004 Jan 23.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-003-9119-4
PMID:14735339
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic hernia repair has been proved superior to open repairs in terms of short-term results, but long-term results of laparoscopic and open mesh repairs have been lacking until recently.

METHODS

A total of 123 patients were randomly allocated to two treatment groups comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernioplasties in three separate trials. The first and second trials compared small and large mesh used in transabdominal preperitoneal repairs, and the third study compared totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty with the Lichtenstein operation. A 5-year follow-up visit was scheduled to assess recurrencies, symptoms, and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

For the follow up evaluation, 121 (98.4%) of the patients were reached. There were five hernia recurrences in the laparoscopic group (small mesh) and two in the Lichtenstein group (difference, 5%; 95% confidence interval, -4-13%; p = 0.3). One patient who underwent the transabdominal preperitoneal polypropylene procedure underwent reoperation 3 years later because of dense small bowel adhesions at the inguinal surgical site. Chronic groin pain was more common after open operation (0 vs 4) patients (difference 7%; confidence interval, -0.4-16%; p = 0.04). Ten patients (16%) in the laparoscopic group and 12 (20%) in the open group reported discomfort or pain at the surgical site.

CONCLUSIONS

Both laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernioplasties have a low risk for hernia recurrence if proper mesh size is used. The patients who undergo hernioplasty with open mesh hernioplasty seem to experience chronic symptoms and pain more often than those managed with the laparoscopic procedure.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜疝修补术在短期疗效方面已被证明优于开放修补术,但直到最近,腹腔镜和开放补片修补术的长期疗效仍不明确。

方法

在三项独立试验中,共有123例患者被随机分配到两个治疗组,比较腹腔镜疝修补术和李金斯坦疝修补术。第一项和第二项试验比较了经腹腹膜前修补术中使用的大小补片,第三项研究比较了完全腹膜外疝修补术和李金斯坦手术。计划进行5年的随访,以评估复发情况、症状和患者满意度。

结果

在随访评估中,联系到了121例(98.4%)患者。腹腔镜组(小补片)有5例疝复发,李金斯坦组有2例(差异为5%;95%置信区间为-4%-13%;p=0.3)。1例接受经腹腹膜前聚丙烯手术的患者在3年后因腹股沟手术部位致密的小肠粘连而再次手术。开放手术后慢性腹股沟疼痛更常见(0例对4例患者)(差异7%;置信区间为-0.4%-16%;p=0.04)。腹腔镜组有10例患者(16%),开放组有12例患者(20%)报告手术部位有不适或疼痛。

结论

如果使用合适尺寸的补片,腹腔镜疝修补术和李金斯坦疝修补术的疝复发风险都较低。接受开放补片疝修补术的患者似乎比接受腹腔镜手术的患者更常出现慢性症状和疼痛。

相似文献

1
Five-year outcome of laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernioplasties.腹腔镜疝修补术和李金斯坦疝修补术的五年疗效
Surg Endosc. 2004 Mar;18(3):518-22. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9119-4. Epub 2004 Jan 23.
2
Lichtenstein hernioplasty versus totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernioplasty in treatment of recurrent inguinal hernia--a prospective randomized trial.利希滕斯坦疝修补术与完全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的前瞻性随机试验
Ann Surg. 2009 Mar;249(3):384-7. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318196d0b0.
3
Recurrence and complications after laparoscopic versus open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized multicenter trial.腹腔镜与开放腹股沟疝修补术后的复发及并发症:一项前瞻性随机多中心试验的结果
Hernia. 2008 Aug;12(4):385-9. doi: 10.1007/s10029-008-0357-1. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
4
Self-adhesive mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. Experience of a single center.用于李金斯坦腹股沟疝修补术的自粘补片。单中心经验。
Minerva Chir. 2014 Jun;69(3):167-76. Epub 2014 Apr 15.
5
Long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of Shouldice, Lichtenstein and transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repairs.Shouldice、Lichtenstein和经腹腹膜前疝修补术随机临床试验的长期结果。
Br J Surg. 2007 May;94(5):562-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5733.
6
Inguinal hernia repair: the choice of prosthesis outweighs that of technique.腹股沟疝修补术:补片的选择比技术的选择更为重要。
Hernia. 2007 Apr;11(2):125-8. doi: 10.1007/s10029-006-0179-y. Epub 2007 Jan 10.
7
The clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of open mesh repairs in adults presenting with a clinically diagnosed primary unilateral inguinal hernia who are operated in an elective setting: systematic review and economic evaluation.在择期手术环境下,对临床诊断为原发性单侧腹股沟疝的成人进行开放式网片修补术的临床有效性和成本效益:系统评价与经济评估
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Nov;19(92):1-142. doi: 10.3310/hta19920.
8
Combined open and laparoscopic approach to chronic pain following open inguinal hernia repair.开放手术与腹腔镜联合治疗开放腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛
Hernia. 2006 Mar;10(1):20-4. doi: 10.1007/s10029-005-0032-8. Epub 2006 Feb 25.
9
[Prospective randomized trial of long-term results of inguinal hernia repair using autoadhesive mesh compared to classic Lichtenstein technique with sutures and polypropylene mesh].[使用自粘性补片与经典的带缝线聚丙烯补片的利希滕斯坦技术相比进行腹股沟疝修补术长期结果的前瞻性随机试验]
Cir Esp. 2014 Mar;92(3):195-200. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2013.03.009. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
10
The comparison of preperitoneal and Lichtenstein repair for incarcerated groin hernias: a randomised controlled trial.经腹膜前修补术与李金斯坦修补术治疗嵌顿性腹股沟疝的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Int J Surg. 2008 Jun;6(3):189-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2008.02.007. Epub 2008 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Long term inguinal pain comparing TEP to Lichtenstein repair: the TEPLICH RCT 8 years follow-up.比较经腹腹膜前修补术(TEP)与李金斯坦修补术的长期腹股沟疼痛:TEPLICH随机对照试验8年随访
Hernia. 2024 Dec 19;29(1):49. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03246-y.
2
Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Compared to Totally Extraperitoneal (TEP) for Primary Inguinal Hernia Repair in a Military Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study.军队医院中经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与完全腹膜外修补术(TEP)治疗原发性腹股沟疝的比较:一项回顾性队列研究
Health Sci Rep. 2024 Dec 17;7(12):e70270. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70270. eCollection 2024 Dec.
3
Transabdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) versus totally extraperitoneal (TEP) laparoscopic techniques for inguinal hernia repair.

本文引用的文献

1
Tension-free inguinal hernia repair: TEP versus mesh-plug versus Lichtenstein: a prospective randomized controlled trial.无张力腹股沟疝修补术:经腹膜前修补术(TEP)与网塞修补术及李金斯坦修补术的比较:一项前瞻性随机对照试验
Ann Surg. 2003 Jan;237(1):142-7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200301000-00020.
2
Recurrences after conventional anterior and laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a randomized comparison.传统开放性和腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术后的复发情况:一项随机对照比较研究
Ann Surg. 2003 Jan;237(1):136-41. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200301000-00019.
3
Five-year follow-up of patients undergoing laparoscopic or open groin hernia repair: a randomized controlled trial.
经腹腹膜前(TAPP)与完全腹膜外(TEP)腹腔镜技术治疗腹股沟疝修补术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 4;7(7):CD004703. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004703.pub3.
4
Sexual dysfunction between laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放式腹股沟疝修补术患者性功能障碍的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jul 14;408(1):277. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03006-z.
5
Long-term results of the SOFTGRIP trial: TIPP versus ProGrip Lichtenstein's inguinal hernia repair.SOFTGRIP 试验的长期结果:TIPP 与 ProGrip 平片式腹股沟疝修补术的比较。
Hernia. 2023 Feb;27(1):139-145. doi: 10.1007/s10029-021-02542-1. Epub 2022 Jan 13.
6
Total extraperitoneal endoscopic hernioplasty (TEP) versus Lichtenstein hernioplasty: a systematic review by updated traditional and cumulative meta-analysis of randomised-controlled trials.完全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术(TEP)与李金斯坦疝修补术的比较:基于更新的传统荟萃分析和累积荟萃分析的随机对照试验的系统评价。
Hernia. 2019 Dec;23(6):1093-1103. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02049-w. Epub 2019 Oct 10.
7
Open versus laparoscopic mesh repair of primary unilateral uncomplicated inguinal hernia: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.开放式与腹腔镜网片修补原发性单侧单纯腹股沟疝的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析及试验序贯分析。
Hernia. 2019 Jun;23(3):461-472. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01989-7. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
8
Long-term results from a randomized comparison of open transinguinal preperitoneal hernia repair and the Lichtenstein method (TULIP trial).经随机对照比较开放经腹前壁疝修补术和李金斯坦法(TULIP 试验)的长期结果。
Br J Surg. 2019 Jun;106(7):856-861. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11178. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
9
Outcome of the "Manchester Groin Repair" (Laparoscopic Totally Extraperitoneal Approach With Fibrin Sealant Mesh Fixation) in 434 Consecutive Inguinal Hernia Repairs.434例连续腹股沟疝修补术中“曼彻斯特腹股沟修补术”(腹腔镜完全腹膜外入路联合纤维蛋白密封剂补片固定)的结果
Front Surg. 2018 Sep 18;5:53. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2018.00053. eCollection 2018.
10
Reoperation for inguinal hernia recurrence in Ontario: a population-based study.安大略省腹股沟疝复发的再次手术:一项基于人群的研究。
Hernia. 2019 Aug;23(4):647-654. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1822-0. Epub 2018 Sep 22.
腹腔镜或开放腹股沟疝修补术患者的五年随访:一项随机对照试验
Ann Surg. 2002 Mar;235(3):333-7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200203000-00004.
4
Repair of groin hernia with synthetic mesh: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.使用合成补片修复腹股沟疝:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Ann Surg. 2002 Mar;235(3):322-32. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200203000-00003.
5
Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty vs Shouldice repair.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术与Shouldice修补术的随机对照试验
Surg Endosc. 2001 Nov;15(11):1263-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9047-0. Epub 2001 Sep 4.
6
Outcomes of laparoscopic herniorrhaphy without fixation of mesh to the abdominal wall.不将补片固定于腹壁的腹腔镜疝修补术的疗效
Surg Endosc. 2001 Oct;15(10):1102-7. doi: 10.1007/s004640080088.
7
Reoperation after recurrent groin hernia repair.复发性腹股沟疝修补术后再次手术。
Ann Surg. 2001 Jul;234(1):122-6. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200107000-00018.
8
Pain and functional impairment 1 year after inguinal herniorrhaphy: a nationwide questionnaire study.腹股沟疝修补术后1年的疼痛与功能障碍:一项全国性问卷调查研究
Ann Surg. 2001 Jan;233(1):1-7. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200101000-00001.
9
Laparoscopic compared with open methods of groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials.腹腔镜与开放腹股沟疝修补术方法的比较:随机对照试验的系统评价
Br J Surg. 2000 Jul;87(7):860-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01540.x.
10
Mesh compared with non-mesh methods of open groin hernia repair: systematic review of randomized controlled trials.与开放式腹股沟疝修补术的非补片方法相比,补片修补术:随机对照试验的系统评价
Br J Surg. 2000 Jul;87(7):854-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01539.x.