Heikkinen T, Bringman S, Ohtonen P, Kunelius P, Haukipuro K, Hulkko A
Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, 90021 OYS, Oulu, PL 21, Finland.
Surg Endosc. 2004 Mar;18(3):518-22. doi: 10.1007/s00464-003-9119-4. Epub 2004 Jan 23.
Laparoscopic hernia repair has been proved superior to open repairs in terms of short-term results, but long-term results of laparoscopic and open mesh repairs have been lacking until recently.
A total of 123 patients were randomly allocated to two treatment groups comparing laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernioplasties in three separate trials. The first and second trials compared small and large mesh used in transabdominal preperitoneal repairs, and the third study compared totally extraperitoneal hernioplasty with the Lichtenstein operation. A 5-year follow-up visit was scheduled to assess recurrencies, symptoms, and patient satisfaction.
For the follow up evaluation, 121 (98.4%) of the patients were reached. There were five hernia recurrences in the laparoscopic group (small mesh) and two in the Lichtenstein group (difference, 5%; 95% confidence interval, -4-13%; p = 0.3). One patient who underwent the transabdominal preperitoneal polypropylene procedure underwent reoperation 3 years later because of dense small bowel adhesions at the inguinal surgical site. Chronic groin pain was more common after open operation (0 vs 4) patients (difference 7%; confidence interval, -0.4-16%; p = 0.04). Ten patients (16%) in the laparoscopic group and 12 (20%) in the open group reported discomfort or pain at the surgical site.
Both laparoscopic and Lichtenstein hernioplasties have a low risk for hernia recurrence if proper mesh size is used. The patients who undergo hernioplasty with open mesh hernioplasty seem to experience chronic symptoms and pain more often than those managed with the laparoscopic procedure.
腹腔镜疝修补术在短期疗效方面已被证明优于开放修补术,但直到最近,腹腔镜和开放补片修补术的长期疗效仍不明确。
在三项独立试验中,共有123例患者被随机分配到两个治疗组,比较腹腔镜疝修补术和李金斯坦疝修补术。第一项和第二项试验比较了经腹腹膜前修补术中使用的大小补片,第三项研究比较了完全腹膜外疝修补术和李金斯坦手术。计划进行5年的随访,以评估复发情况、症状和患者满意度。
在随访评估中,联系到了121例(98.4%)患者。腹腔镜组(小补片)有5例疝复发,李金斯坦组有2例(差异为5%;95%置信区间为-4%-13%;p=0.3)。1例接受经腹腹膜前聚丙烯手术的患者在3年后因腹股沟手术部位致密的小肠粘连而再次手术。开放手术后慢性腹股沟疼痛更常见(0例对4例患者)(差异7%;置信区间为-0.4%-16%;p=0.04)。腹腔镜组有10例患者(16%),开放组有12例患者(20%)报告手术部位有不适或疼痛。
如果使用合适尺寸的补片,腹腔镜疝修补术和李金斯坦疝修补术的疝复发风险都较低。接受开放补片疝修补术的患者似乎比接受腹腔镜手术的患者更常出现慢性症状和疼痛。