Campbell Jamie I D, Parker Helen R, Doetzel Nicole L
Department of Psychology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jan;30(1):51-64. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.51.
In Experiment 1, adults (n = 48) performed simple addition, multiplication, and parity (i.e., odd-even) comparisons on pairs of Arabic digits or English number words. For addition and comparison, but not multiplication, response time increased with the number of odd operands. For addition, but not comparison, this parity effect was greater for words than for digits. In Experiment 2, adults (n = 50) solved simple addition problems in digit and word format and reported their strategies (i.e., retrieval or procedures). Procedural strategies were used more for odd than even addends and much more for word than digit problems. The results indicate that problem encoding and answer retrieval processes for cognitive arithmetic are interactive rather than strictly additive stages.
在实验1中,成年人(n = 48)对阿拉伯数字对或英语数字单词进行简单加法、乘法及奇偶性(即奇数-偶数)比较。对于加法和比较(而非乘法),反应时间随奇数操作数的数量增加而增加。对于加法(而非比较),这种奇偶性效应在单词上比在数字上更明显。在实验2中,成年人(n = 50)解决数字和单词格式的简单加法问题并报告他们的策略(即检索或计算过程)。计算过程策略在奇数加数上的使用比偶数加数更多,在单词问题上的使用比数字问题多得多。结果表明,认知算术的问题编码和答案检索过程是交互式的,而非严格的累加阶段。