• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从语言中获取的空间记忆中的参照系。

Frames of reference in spatial memories acquired from language.

作者信息

Mou Weimin, Zhang Kan, McNamara Timothy P

机构信息

Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jan;30(1):171-80. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.171.

DOI:10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.171
PMID:14736305
Abstract

Four experiments examined reference systems in spatial memories acquired from language. Participants read narratives that located 4 objects in canonical (front, back, left, right) or noncanonical (left front, right front, left back, right back) positions around them. Participants' focus of attention was first set on each of the 4 objects, and then they were asked to report the name of the object at the location indicated by a direction word or an iconic arrow. The results indicated that spatial memories were represented in terms of intrinsic (object-to-object) reference systems, which were selected using egocentric cues (e.g., alignment with body axes). Results also indicated that linguistic direction cues were comprehended in terms of egocentric reference systems, whereas iconic arrows were not.

摘要

四项实验研究了从语言中获取的空间记忆中的参照系。参与者阅读叙述内容,其中将四个物体放置在他们周围的规范位置(前、后、左、右)或非规范位置(左前、右前、左后、右后)。参与者的注意力焦点首先集中在这四个物体中的每一个上,然后要求他们说出由方向词或图标箭头指示位置处的物体名称。结果表明,空间记忆是以内在的(物体到物体的)参照系来表征的,这些参照系是通过自我中心线索(例如,与身体轴线对齐)来选择的。结果还表明,语言方向线索是根据自我中心参照系来理解的,而图标箭头则不是。

相似文献

1
Frames of reference in spatial memories acquired from language.从语言中获取的空间记忆中的参照系。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jan;30(1):171-80. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.171.
2
Egocentric reference in bidirectional readers as measured by the straight-ahead pointing task.通过直视指向任务测量双向阅读者的自我中心参照。
Brain Res. 2009 Jan 9;1247:133-41. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2008.09.098. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
3
Children's use of frames of reference in communication of spatial location.儿童在传达空间位置时对参照系的运用。
Child Dev. 1990 Oct;61(5):1528-43.
4
Selecting one among many referents in spatial situation models.在空间情境模型中的多个参照对象中进行选择。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Jan;27(1):81-98.
5
Reference directions and reference objects in spatial memory of a briefly viewed layout.短暂呈现布局的空间记忆中的参考方向和参考对象。
Cognition. 2008 Jul;108(1):136-54. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.02.004. Epub 2008 Mar 14.
6
Allocentric versus egocentric spatial memory after unilateral temporal lobectomy in humans.人类单侧颞叶切除术后的自我中心与他我中心空间记忆
Neuropsychology. 2004 Jul;18(3):462-72. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.18.3.462.
7
Allocentric and egocentric updating of spatial memories.空间记忆的以参照为中心和以自我为中心的更新。
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Jan;30(1):142-57. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.1.142.
8
Layout geometry in encoding and retrieval of spatial memory.空间记忆编码与检索中的布局几何结构。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Feb;35(1):83-93. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.35.1.83.
9
Systems of spatial reference in human memory.人类记忆中的空间参照系统。
Cogn Psychol. 2001 Dec;43(4):274-310. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0758.
10
Intrinsic frames of reference and egocentric viewpoints in scene recognition.场景识别中的内在参照系和自我中心观点。
Cognition. 2008 Feb;106(2):750-69. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.009. Epub 2007 May 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Do People Regard Robots as Human-Like Social Partners? Evidence From Perspective-Taking in Spatial Descriptions.人们将机器人视为类人社交伙伴吗?来自空间描述中视角采择的证据。
Front Psychol. 2021 Feb 5;11:578244. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.578244. eCollection 2020.
2
MAGELLAN: a cognitive map-based model of human wayfinding.麦哲伦:一种基于认知地图的人类寻路模型。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2014 Jun;143(3):1314-1330. doi: 10.1037/a0035542. Epub 2014 Feb 3.
3
Flexible spatial perspective-taking: conversational partners weigh multiple cues in collaborative tasks.
灵活的空间视角转换:对话伙伴在协作任务中权衡多种线索。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 26;7:618. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00618. eCollection 2013.
4
Abstract spatial concept priming dynamically influences real-world actions.抽象空间概念启动会对现实世界中的行为产生动态影响。
Front Psychol. 2012 Sep 27;3:361. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00361. eCollection 2012.
5
Haptic experiences influence visually acquired memories: reference frames during multimodal spatial learning.触觉体验影响视觉获得的记忆:多模态空间学习中的参照系。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Dec;18(6):1119-25. doi: 10.3758/s13423-011-0162-1.
6
Conceptual layers and strategies in tour planning.旅游规划中的概念层次与策略
Cogn Process. 2011 Feb;12(1):109-25. doi: 10.1007/s10339-010-0373-9. Epub 2010 Oct 13.
7
Spatial frameworks in imagined navigation.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Jun;13(3):510-5. doi: 10.3758/bf03193878.