Department of Psychology, University of Cyprus Nicosia, Cyprus.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Sep 26;7:618. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00618. eCollection 2013.
Research on spatial perspective-taking often focuses on the cognitive processes of isolated individuals as they adopt or maintain imagined perspectives. Collaborative studies of spatial perspective-taking typically examine speakers' linguistic choices, while overlooking their underlying processes and representations. We review evidence from two collaborative experiments that examine the contribution of social and representational cues to spatial perspective choices in both language and the organization of spatial memory. Across experiments, speakers organized their memory representations according to the convergence of various cues. When layouts were randomly configured and did not afford intrinsic cues, speakers encoded their partner's viewpoint in memory, if available, but did not use it as an organizing direction. On the other hand, when the layout afforded an intrinsic structure, speakers organized their spatial memories according to the person-centered perspective reinforced by the layout's structure. Similarly, in descriptions, speakers considered multiple cues whether available a priori or at the interaction. They used partner-centered expressions more frequently (e.g., "to your right") when the partner's viewpoint was misaligned by a small offset or coincided with the layout's structure. Conversely, they used egocentric expressions more frequently when their own viewpoint coincided with the intrinsic structure or when the partner was misaligned by a computationally difficult, oblique offset. Based on these findings we advocate for a framework for flexible perspective-taking: people weigh multiple cues (including social ones) to make attributions about the relative difficulty of perspective-taking for each partner, and adapt behavior to minimize their collective effort. This framework is not specialized for spatial reasoning but instead emerges from the same principles and memory-depended processes that govern perspective-taking in non-spatial tasks.
空间视角采择的研究通常侧重于孤立个体在采用或保持想象视角时的认知过程。空间视角采择的协作研究通常考察说话者的语言选择,而忽略了其潜在的过程和表示。我们回顾了两个协作实验的证据,这些实验考察了社会和表示线索对语言和空间记忆组织中空间视角选择的贡献。在整个实验中,说话者根据各种线索的融合来组织他们的记忆表示。当布局是随机配置的且没有内在线索时,如果有可用的信息,说话者会在记忆中编码他们的伙伴的视角,但不会将其用作组织方向。另一方面,当布局提供内在结构时,说话者会根据布局结构增强的以人中心的视角来组织他们的空间记忆。类似地,在描述中,说话者会考虑多种线索,无论这些线索是先验存在还是在交互中存在。当伙伴的视角由于小的偏移或与布局结构一致而没有对齐时,他们更频繁地使用以伙伴为中心的表达(例如,“在你的右边”)。相反,当他们自己的视角与内在结构一致或当伙伴的视角由于计算上困难的倾斜偏移而不一致时,他们更频繁地使用以自我为中心的表达。基于这些发现,我们倡导一种灵活视角采择的框架:人们权衡多种线索(包括社会线索),以便对每个伙伴进行视角采择相对难度的归因,并调整行为以最小化他们的集体努力。这个框架不是专门为空间推理设计的,而是从同样的原则和记忆依赖过程中涌现出来的,这些原则和记忆依赖过程控制着非空间任务中的视角采择。