Guagliardo Mark F, Jablonski Kathleen A, Joseph Jill G, Goodman David C
Department of Prevention and Community Health, The George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services, Washington, DC, USA.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2004 Jan 22;4(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-4-2.
In the U.S. small-area health services research studies are often based on the hospital service areas (HSAs) defined by the Dartmouth Atlas of Healthcare project. These areas are based on the geographic origins of Medicare Part A hospital patients, the great majority of whom are seniors. It is reasonable to question whether the geographic system so defined is appropriate for health services research for all ages, particularly for children, who have a very different system of healthcare financing and provision in the U.S.
This article assesses the need for a unique system of HSAs to support pediatric small-area analyses. It is a cross-sectional analysis of California hospital discharges for two age groups - non-newborns 0-17 years old, and seniors. The measure of interest was index of localization, which is the percentage of HSA residents hospitalized in their home HSA. Indices were computed separately for each age group, and index agreement was assessed for 219 of the state's HSAs. We examined the effect of local pediatric inpatient volume and pediatric inpatient resources on the divergence of the age group indices. We also created a new system of HSAs based solely on pediatric patient origins, and visually compared maps of the traditional and the new system.
The mean localization index for pediatric discharges was 20 percentage points lower than for Medicare cases, indicating a poorer fit of the traditional geographic system for children. The volume of pediatric cases did not appear to be associated with the magnitude of index divergence between the two age groups. Pediatric medical and surgical case subgroups gave very similar results, and both groups differed substantially from seniors. Location of children's hospitals and local pediatric bed supply were associated with Medicare-pediatric divergence. There was little visual correspondence between the maps of traditional and pediatric-specific HSAs.
Children and seniors have significantly different geographic patterns of hospitalization in California. Medicare-based HSAs may not be appropriate for all age groups and service types throughout the U.S.
在美国,小区域卫生服务研究通常基于达特茅斯医疗保健地图项目所定义的医院服务区(HSA)。这些区域基于医疗保险A部分住院患者的地理来源,其中绝大多数是老年人。对于这样定义的地理系统是否适用于所有年龄段的卫生服务研究,尤其是对于儿童,这是一个合理的问题,因为在美国,儿童拥有截然不同的医疗保健融资和提供体系。
本文评估了是否需要一个独特的医院服务区系统来支持儿科小区域分析。这是一项对加利福尼亚州两个年龄组(0至17岁非新生儿和老年人)的医院出院情况进行的横断面分析。关注的指标是本地化指数,即在家乡医院服务区住院的医院服务区居民的百分比。分别为每个年龄组计算指数,并对该州219个医院服务区的指数一致性进行评估。我们研究了当地儿科住院量和儿科住院资源对年龄组指数差异的影响。我们还仅基于儿科患者来源创建了一个新的医院服务区系统,并直观地比较了传统系统和新系统的地图。
儿科出院的平均本地化指数比医疗保险病例低20个百分点,这表明传统地理系统对儿童的适用性较差。儿科病例数量似乎与两个年龄组之间指数差异的大小无关。儿科内科和外科病例亚组的结果非常相似,且两组与老年人都有很大差异。儿童医院的位置和当地儿科病床供应与医疗保险 - 儿科差异相关。传统医院服务区地图和特定于儿科的医院服务区地图之间几乎没有视觉上的对应关系。
在加利福尼亚州,儿童和老年人的住院地理模式存在显著差异。基于医疗保险的医院服务区可能不适用于美国所有年龄组和服务类型。