Kunkle Gail A, Nicklin Constance F, Sullivan-Tamboe Deborah L
Blanche Saunders Dermatology Laboratory, Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610-0126, USA.
J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2004 Jan-Feb;40(1):42-6. doi: 10.5326/0400042.
The purpose of this study was to determine if the temperatures obtained using a veterinary infrared (IR) thermometer agreed with a digital rectal thermometer in a group of research cats, half of which had transient fevers. The thermometers were weakly correlated (r=0.62). The mean difference was 0.13 degrees F (0.07 degrees C), and the limits of agreement were 2.6 degrees F (1.43 degrees C) and -2.5 degrees F (-1.36 degrees C), which were unacceptable for clinical purposes. The results of this study indicate that, while the IR thermometer was easy to use, it cannot be used interchangeably with the rectal thermometer.
本研究的目的是确定在一组研究用猫中,使用兽医红外(IR)温度计测得的温度与数字直肠温度计测得的温度是否一致,其中一半的猫有短暂发热。两种温度计的相关性较弱(r = 0.62)。平均差值为0.13华氏度(0.07摄氏度),一致性界限为2.6华氏度(1.43摄氏度)和 -2.5华氏度(-1.36摄氏度),从临床角度来看这是不可接受的。本研究结果表明,虽然红外温度计使用方便,但不能与直肠温度计互换使用。