Boyle Kyndall L., Witt Philip, Riegger-Krugh Cheryl
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.
J Athl Train. 2003 Dec;38(4):281-285.
Clinicians may benefit from using a joint mobility index to screen for individuals on the high end of the spectrum of joint laxity (ie, those with generalized joint laxity), which may be associated with musculoskeletal complaints. Reliability of the Beighton and Horan Joint Mobility Index (BHJMI) has not been reported in the literature. Our purpose was to determine intrarater and interrater reliability of (1) composite BHJMI scores (the overall score from 0 to 9), and (2) categorized scores, the BHJMI scores in 3 categories (0 to 2, 3 to 4, and 5 to 9) DESIGN AND SETTING: This was an intrarater and interrater reliability study. Data were collected in an academic physical therapy department and in a high school. SUBJECTS: Forty-two (intrarater) and 36 (interrater) female volunteers, aged 15 to 45 years. MEASUREMENTS: Subjects were screened using the BHJMI. Percentage agreement and the Spearman rho were used to analyze BHJMI composite and category scores. RESULTS: The percentage agreement and the Spearman rho for intrarater and interrater reliability of BHJMI composite scores were 69% and.86 and 51% and.87, respectively. The percentage agreement and the Spearman rho for intrarater and interrater reliability of the category scores were 81% and.81 and 89% and.75, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Reliability of the BHJMI was good to excellent in screening for generalized joint laxity in females aged 15 to 45 years.
临床医生使用关节活动度指数筛查关节松弛度处于较高水平(即患有全身性关节松弛症)的个体可能会有所帮助,这些个体可能伴有肌肉骨骼方面的不适。文献中尚未报道贝顿和霍兰关节活动度指数(BHJMI)的可靠性。我们的目的是确定(1)BHJMI综合评分(0至9的总分)以及(2)分类评分(BHJMI评分分为0至2、3至4和5至9三个类别)的评估者内和评估者间的可靠性。
这是一项评估者内和评估者间的可靠性研究。数据在一所大学物理治疗系和一所高中收集。
42名(评估者内)和36名(评估者间)年龄在15至45岁的女性志愿者。
使用BHJMI对受试者进行筛查。采用百分比一致性和斯皮尔曼等级相关系数分析BHJMI综合评分和分类评分。
BHJMI综合评分的评估者内和评估者间可靠性的百分比一致性和斯皮尔曼等级相关系数分别为69%和0.86以及51%和r0.87。分类评分的评估者内和评估者间可靠性的百分比一致性和斯皮尔曼等级相关系数分别为81%和0.81以及89%和0.75。
在筛查15至45岁女性的全身性关节松弛症方面,BHJMI的可靠性良好至优秀。