Suppr超能文献

贝ighton和霍兰关节活动度指数的评分者内信度和评分者间信度

Intrarater and Interrater Reliability of the Beighton and Horan Joint Mobility Index.

作者信息

Boyle Kyndall L., Witt Philip, Riegger-Krugh Cheryl

机构信息

University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC.

出版信息

J Athl Train. 2003 Dec;38(4):281-285.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Clinicians may benefit from using a joint mobility index to screen for individuals on the high end of the spectrum of joint laxity (ie, those with generalized joint laxity), which may be associated with musculoskeletal complaints. Reliability of the Beighton and Horan Joint Mobility Index (BHJMI) has not been reported in the literature. Our purpose was to determine intrarater and interrater reliability of (1) composite BHJMI scores (the overall score from 0 to 9), and (2) categorized scores, the BHJMI scores in 3 categories (0 to 2, 3 to 4, and 5 to 9) DESIGN AND SETTING: This was an intrarater and interrater reliability study. Data were collected in an academic physical therapy department and in a high school. SUBJECTS: Forty-two (intrarater) and 36 (interrater) female volunteers, aged 15 to 45 years. MEASUREMENTS: Subjects were screened using the BHJMI. Percentage agreement and the Spearman rho were used to analyze BHJMI composite and category scores. RESULTS: The percentage agreement and the Spearman rho for intrarater and interrater reliability of BHJMI composite scores were 69% and.86 and 51% and.87, respectively. The percentage agreement and the Spearman rho for intrarater and interrater reliability of the category scores were 81% and.81 and 89% and.75, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Reliability of the BHJMI was good to excellent in screening for generalized joint laxity in females aged 15 to 45 years.

摘要

目的

临床医生使用关节活动度指数筛查关节松弛度处于较高水平(即患有全身性关节松弛症)的个体可能会有所帮助,这些个体可能伴有肌肉骨骼方面的不适。文献中尚未报道贝顿和霍兰关节活动度指数(BHJMI)的可靠性。我们的目的是确定(1)BHJMI综合评分(0至9的总分)以及(2)分类评分(BHJMI评分分为0至2、3至4和5至9三个类别)的评估者内和评估者间的可靠性。

设计与环境

这是一项评估者内和评估者间的可靠性研究。数据在一所大学物理治疗系和一所高中收集。

受试者

42名(评估者内)和36名(评估者间)年龄在15至45岁的女性志愿者。

测量方法

使用BHJMI对受试者进行筛查。采用百分比一致性和斯皮尔曼等级相关系数分析BHJMI综合评分和分类评分。

结果

BHJMI综合评分的评估者内和评估者间可靠性的百分比一致性和斯皮尔曼等级相关系数分别为69%和0.86以及51%和r0.87。分类评分的评估者内和评估者间可靠性的百分比一致性和斯皮尔曼等级相关系数分别为81%和0.81以及89%和0.75。

结论

在筛查15至45岁女性的全身性关节松弛症方面,BHJMI的可靠性良好至优秀。

相似文献

3
The Functional Movement Screen: a reliability study.功能性运动筛查:可靠性研究。
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;42(6):530-40. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2012.3838. Epub 2012 May 14.
6
Interrater and Intrarater Reliability of the Beighton Score: A Systematic Review.贝顿评分的评分者间和评分者内信度:一项系统评价
Orthop J Sports Med. 2021 Jan 20;9(1):2325967120968099. doi: 10.1177/2325967120968099. eCollection 2021 Jan.

引用本文的文献

5
Comparison of Intervention Programs to Improve Trunk Stability for Active Females.改善活跃女性躯干稳定性的干预方案比较
Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2023 Dec 1;18(6):1319-1330. doi: 10.26603/001c.89667. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

5
The benign hypermobile joint syndrome.良性关节过度活动综合征
Arthritis Rheum. 1980 Sep;23(9):1053-6. doi: 10.1002/art.1780230914.
9
Changes in joint laxity occurring during pregnancy.孕期关节松弛度的变化。
Ann Rheum Dis. 1982 Apr;41(2):126-8. doi: 10.1136/ard.41.2.126.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验