Department of Physical and Occupational Therapy, Copenhagen University Hospital at Glostrup, Denmark.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Oct;92(10):1630-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.04.020. Epub 2011 Aug 27.
To examine the intrarater and interrater reliability and agreement of the Danish version of the Dynamic Gait Index (DGI) in hospitalized and community-dwelling older people with balance impairments.
Reliability study.
University hospital and outpatient rehabilitation.
A convenience sample of older people (≥65y); 24 subjects from a hospital and 24 from an outpatient rehabilitation center. All subjects had either 1 or more falls within the last year or balance impairments evaluated by a physical therapist.
Not applicable.
All subjects carried out the DGI twice with a 1.5-hour interval. Each subject was rated by 3 physical therapists in the first attempt (1 for intrarater and 2 for interrater comparison) and by the intrarater in the second attempt, in both settings. The reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC, 2.1), while agreement was calculated as the smallest real difference (SRD).
The ICC for intrarater and interrater reliability of the total DGI was .90 and .92 at the hospital, while the SRD was 2.72 and 2.58 points, respectively. Correspondingly, the ICC for intrarater and interrater reliability of the total DGI at the rehabilitation center was .89 and .82, while the SRD was 3.49 and 3.99 points, respectively.
The intrarater and interrater reliability of the total DGI ranged from good to excellent in hospitalized and community-dwelling older people. Improvements of 3 and 4 DGI points for hospitalized and community-dwelling older people, respectively, should be regarded as a real change (with a 95% certainty).
研究丹麦版动态步态指数(DGI)在住院和社区居住的平衡障碍老年人中的组内和组间信度和一致性。
可靠性研究。
大学医院和门诊康复中心。
一个平衡障碍老年人的便利样本(≥65 岁);来自医院的 24 名受试者和来自门诊康复中心的 24 名受试者。所有受试者在过去一年中均有 1 次或更多跌倒或经物理治疗师评估有平衡障碍。
不适用。
所有受试者均在 1.5 小时间隔内两次进行 DGI 测试。每位受试者在第一次尝试时由 3 名物理治疗师进行评估(1 名用于组内比较,2 名用于组间比较),并在两种情况下由组内比较在第二次尝试时进行评估。可靠性使用组内相关系数(ICC,2.1)进行计算,而一致性则作为最小实际差异(SRD)进行计算。
在医院中,DGI 总分的组内和组间信度的 ICC 分别为.90 和.92,而 SRD 分别为 2.72 和 2.58 分。相应地,康复中心中 DGI 总分的组内和组间信度的 ICC 分别为.89 和.82,而 SRD 分别为 3.49 和 3.99 分。
住院和社区居住的老年人的 DGI 总分的组内和组间信度均为良好至优秀。对于住院和社区居住的老年人,DGI 分别提高 3 分和 4 分应被视为真正的变化(有 95%的把握)。