• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

助产士和住院医生进行的新生儿常规检查质量;一项使用录像的评估。

The quality of routine examinations of the newborn performed by midwives and SHOs; an evaluation using video recordings.

作者信息

Bloomfield L, Rogers C, Townsend J, Wolke D, Quist-Therson E

机构信息

Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.

出版信息

J Med Screen. 2003;10(4):176-80. doi: 10.1258/096914103771773267.

DOI:10.1258/096914103771773267
PMID:14738654
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the quality of the routine examination of the newborn as carried out by senior house officers (SHOs) and midwives.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial set in a district general hospital in Southeast England. Eligible babies were randomised to a midwife (11) or an SHO (8) who were then video recorded undertaking the routine newborn examination.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Quality of 62 observed technical and communication components of the newborn examination, as agreed between independent consultant paediatrician and senior midwife raters.

RESULTS

Major differences were found in the rated quality of examinations between midwives and SHOs for the examinations of the heart and lungs, for the overall quality of the examination, and in areas of communication skills. Quality of examination of the hips was assessed as poor for both professional groups. Where there were significant differences between examiners, the quality of the midwives' examinations was higher. Inter-rater agreement between the consultant paediatricians and senior midwives ranged from excellent to poor for different items of the examination with a mean kappa value of 0.42 across all items indicating moderate agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

The quality of midwife examinations exceeded that of SHOs. All midwives who examine receive formalized training in the examination of the newborn; SHOs may benefit from similar specific training. Training for both professional groups may need to be reviewed, particularly in relation to agreement on 'gold standards' for the screening of developmental dysplasia of the hip.

摘要

目的

评估住院医师(SHOs)和助产士进行的新生儿常规检查质量。

设计

在英格兰东南部一家地区综合医院开展的随机对照试验。符合条件的婴儿被随机分配给一名助产士(11名)或一名住院医师(8名),随后对他们进行新生儿常规检查的过程进行录像。

主要观察指标

由独立的儿科顾问医生和资深助产士评估人员共同确定的新生儿检查中62项观察到的技术和沟通要素的质量。

结果

在心脏和肺部检查、检查的整体质量以及沟通技能方面,助产士和住院医师的检查质量评分存在重大差异。两个专业组对髋关节检查质量的评估都较差。在检查人员之间存在显著差异的地方,助产士的检查质量更高。儿科顾问医生和资深助产士之间的评分者间一致性在检查的不同项目中从优秀到较差不等,所有项目的平均kappa值为0.42,表明一致性中等。

结论

助产士的检查质量超过住院医师。所有进行检查的助产士都接受过新生儿检查的正规培训;住院医师可能会从类似的专项培训中受益。可能需要对两个专业组的培训进行审查,特别是在关于髋关节发育不良筛查的“金标准”达成一致方面。

相似文献

1
The quality of routine examinations of the newborn performed by midwives and SHOs; an evaluation using video recordings.助产士和住院医生进行的新生儿常规检查质量;一项使用录像的评估。
J Med Screen. 2003;10(4):176-80. doi: 10.1258/096914103771773267.
2
Routine examination of the newborn: the EMREN study. Evaluation of an extension of the midwife role including a randomised controlled trial of appropriately trained midwives and paediatric senior house officers.新生儿常规检查:EMREN研究。对助产士角色扩展的评估,包括对经过适当培训的助产士和儿科住院医师进行的随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Apr;8(14):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-100. doi: 10.3310/hta8140.
3
A qualitative study exploring junior paediatricians', midwives', GPs' and mothers' experiences and views of the examination of the newborn baby.一项质性研究,探讨初级儿科医生、助产士、全科医生及母亲对新生儿检查的经历和看法。
Midwifery. 2003 Mar;19(1):37-45. doi: 10.1054/midw.2002.0323.
4
A national survey in England of the routine examination of the newborn baby.英格兰一项关于新生儿常规检查的全国性调查。
Midwifery. 2003 Dec;19(4):277-84. doi: 10.1016/s0266-6138(03)00044-5.
5
Midwives' visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement.助产士对产时胎心监护图的视觉解读:观察者内部及观察者间的一致性
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Oct;52(2):133-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03575.x.
6
A randomised-controlled trial in England of a postnatal midwifery intervention on breast-feeding duration.在英国进行的一项关于产后助产干预对母乳喂养持续时间影响的随机对照试验。
Midwifery. 2006 Sep;22(3):262-73. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2005.06.004. Epub 2005 Dec 27.
7
Routine examination of the newborn and maternal satisfaction: a randomised controlled trial.新生儿常规检查与产妇满意度:一项随机对照试验。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2002 May;86(3):F155-60. doi: 10.1136/fn.86.3.f155.
8
[Summary of the Dutch College of General Practitioners' practice guideline, "Examination of the neonate"].
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2002 Nov 9;146(45):2140-4.
9
Neonatal examination: are midwives clinically effective?新生儿检查:助产士在临床上是否有效?
RCM Midwives. 2005 Mar;8(3):116-8.
10
Inter-observer variation in assessment of 845 labour admission tests: comparison between midwives and obstetricians in the clinical setting and two experts.845例分娩入院检查评估中的观察者间差异:临床环境下助产士与产科医生及两名专家的比较
BJOG. 2003 Jan;110(1):1-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Place & Person involved in delivery: Factors leading to delay in diagnosis of Anorectal Malformation in Newborns.分娩地点及相关人员:导致新生儿肛门直肠畸形诊断延迟的因素。
Pak J Med Sci. 2022 Jan-Feb;38(1):297-301. doi: 10.12669/pjms.38.1.4156.
2
Delayed presentation of anorectal malformations in a tertiary care hospital in India.印度一家三级护理医院的肛门直肠畸形的延误表现。
Pediatr Surg Int. 2021 Apr;37(4):451-456. doi: 10.1007/s00383-020-04843-5. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
3
Early dynamic ultrasound for neonatal hip instability: implications for rural Australia.
新生儿髋关节不稳定的早期动态超声检查:对澳大利亚农村地区的意义
BMC Pediatr. 2017 Mar 21;17(1):82. doi: 10.1186/s12887-017-0830-z.
4
Screening programmes for developmental dysplasia of the hip in newborn infants.新生儿髋关节发育不良筛查项目
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7;2011(9):CD004595. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004595.pub2.
5
Does lack of routine postnatal examination on maternity unit increase the risk of hospital admission in the first week of life?产后病房缺乏常规检查是否会增加新生儿在生命第一周住院的风险?
Eur J Pediatr. 2010 Feb;169(2):187-90. doi: 10.1007/s00431-009-1003-3. Epub 2009 Jun 4.