Wallace Louise M, Dunn Orla M, Alder Elizabeth M, Inch Sally, Hills Robert K, Law Susan M
Health Services Research Centre, GE404, School of Health, Coventry University, Priory Street, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK.
Midwifery. 2006 Sep;22(3):262-73. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2005.06.004. Epub 2005 Dec 27.
To determine whether postnatal 'hands off' care by midwives on positioning and attachment of the newborn baby improves breast-feeding duration.
Mothers were randomised at the first postnatal feed to receive either care by a midwife trained in the experimental protocol or by a control midwife undertaking routine care.
Eight wards in four English Midlands hospitals.
370 primiparous mothers with term babies who intended to breast feed, and could sit out of bed to do so.
Experimental protocol of verbal-only advice on positioning and attachment, delivered at the first postnatal ward feed compared with routine care by a qualified midwife.
Duration of breast feeding up to 17 weeks as assessed by diaries and interviews with mothers and protocol adherence from self-completed checklist by the midwife. The mothers' self-reported experience of care and support before, during and after delivery were assessed at 6 weeks, and feeding outcomes and employment status at 17 weeks.
Experimental group mothers more often held the baby across their lap and received 'hands off advice', but fewer babies in the experimental than control groups attached and fed: 59% (106/180) vs. 67% (118/175), p=0.1. No significant differences were found in the numbers of mothers breast feeding at 6 or 17 weeks in the experimental and control groups (stopped exclusive breast feeding: 76% (130/172) vs. 77% (126/163) at 6 weeks; 96% (167/174) vs. 96% (161/168) at 17 weeks; odds ratio 1.02, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.22; p=0.8; stopped any breast feeding: 35% (61/172) vs. 32% (53/167) at 6 weeks; 63% (109/173) vs. 60% (101/167) at 17 weeks; odds ratio 1.10, 0.84 to 1.45; p=0.5). There were no significant differences in the incidence of problems with breast feeding and care experienced by mothers before or during hospitalisation (other than at the first postnatal ward feed), nor after discharge home.
No significant beneficial effect was found on breast-feeding duration of the verbal- only advice on positioning and attachment, perhaps because aspects of the intervention are already within routine UK practice. Other care practices at subsequent feeds may negate benefits of care at earlier feeds. 'Hands off' care at the first feed may be less important to subsequent feeding than achieving a first feed under supervision in the postnatal ward.
Midwives can be trained in a 4-hr workshop to achieve improved knowledge of 'hands off' positioning and attachment care, and these can be translated into clinical practice. Future studies should differentiate the elements of the care that are effective in achieving postnatal feeds, and apply this advice consistently at successive feeds.
确定助产士在新生儿体位摆放和含接方面采取的产后“不干预”护理是否能延长母乳喂养时间。
母亲们在产后首次喂奶时被随机分组,分别接受接受过实验方案培训的助产士的护理或进行常规护理的对照助产士的护理。
英格兰中部地区四家医院的八个病房。
370名初产妇,她们的足月婴儿打算进行母乳喂养,且能够坐起来喂奶。
在产后病房首次喂奶时,提供关于体位摆放和含接的纯口头建议的实验方案,与合格助产士的常规护理进行对比。
通过母亲的日记和访谈评估至17周的母乳喂养时长,以及助产士根据自我填写的检查表得出的方案依从性。在产后6周评估母亲在分娩前、分娩期间和分娩后的自我报告的护理和支持体验,在产后17周评估喂养结果和就业状况。
实验组母亲更常将婴儿抱在腿上并接受“不干预建议”,但实验组中含接并进行喂养的婴儿比对照组少:59%(106/180)对67%(118/175),p = 0.1。实验组和对照组在产后6周或17周进行母乳喂养的母亲数量没有显著差异(停止纯母乳喂养:产后6周时为76%(130/172)对77%(126/163);产后17周时为96%(167/174)对96%(161/168);优势比1.02,95%置信区间0.77至1.22;p = 0.8;停止任何母乳喂养:产后6周时为35%(61/172)对32%(53/167);产后17周时为63%(109/173)对60%(101/167);优势比1.10,0.84至1.45;p = 0.5)。母亲在住院前或住院期间(产后病房首次喂奶除外)以及出院后经历的母乳喂养和护理问题发生率没有显著差异。
关于体位摆放和含接的纯口头建议对母乳喂养时长没有显著的有益影响,可能是因为该干预措施的某些方面已在英国的常规实践中存在。后续喂奶时的其他护理措施可能会抵消早期喂奶时护理的益处。产后首次喂奶时的“不干预”护理对后续喂养可能不如在产后病房的监督下实现首次喂奶重要。
助产士可以通过参加4小时的工作坊接受培训,以提高对“不干预”体位摆放和含接护理的认识,并将这些知识转化为临床实践。未来的研究应区分在实现产后喂奶方面有效的护理要素,并在后续喂奶中持续应用这些建议。