Komaba Yuichi, Mishina Masahiro, Utsumi Kouichi, Katayama Yasuo, Kobayashi Shiro, Mori Osamu
Second Department of Internal Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Stroke. 2004 Feb;35(2):472-6. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000109771.56160.F5. Epub 2004 Jan 22.
Crossed cerebellar diaschisis (CCD) refers to reduced metabolism and blood flow in the cerebellar hemisphere contralateral to a cerebral lesion. Many cortical areas have been reported to cause CCD without consideration of confounding factors. We performed single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients with cortical infarction to identify regions independently related to CCD, controlling for possible confounding effects.
Patients with unilateral cortical infarction (n=113; 75 male, 38 female; mean+/-SD age, 66+/-13 years) underwent SPECT of the brain with N-isopropyl-p-[(123)I]iodoamphetamine ((123)I-IMP). Regional cerebral blood flow was measured autoradiographically. Asymmetry indices (AIs) were calculated on the basis of ratios representing symmetrical regional cerebral blood flow in the cerebellum and 16 cerebral regions. CCD was defined as AI for cerebellum >0.1. AIs for 16 cortical regions were considered for both dichotomous and continuous variables for analysis of CCD occurrence by means of backward logistic regression.
For dichotomized variables, hypoperfusion of postcentral (odds ratio [OR]=7.607; 95% CI, 2.299 to 25.174) and supramarginal (OR=3.916; 95% CI, 1.394 to 11.003) regions independently influenced CCD. For continuous variables, hypoperfusion of postcentral (OR=1.044; 95% CI, 1.019 to 1.068) and supramarginal (OR=1.021; 95% CI, 1.001 to 1.041) regions (and, as a negative factor, medial occipital regions; OR=0.942; 95% CI, 0.895 to 0.991) independently influenced CCD.
Many cortical areas apparently do not contribute to CCD. Correspondence of CCD between dichotomized and continuous analyses suggests that location of a lesion, not severity, is the main determinant of CCD.
交叉性小脑神经机能联系失联络(CCD)是指大脑病变对侧小脑半球代谢及血流减少。许多皮质区域被报道可导致CCD,但未考虑混杂因素。我们对皮质梗死患者进行单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT),以识别与CCD独立相关的区域,并控制可能的混杂效应。
单侧皮质梗死患者(n = 113;男性75例,女性38例;平均±标准差年龄,66±13岁)接受用N - 异丙基 - p - [(123)I]碘安非他明((123)I - IMP)进行的脑部SPECT检查。通过放射自显影法测量局部脑血流量。基于代表小脑和16个脑区对称局部脑血流量的比率计算不对称指数(AI)。CCD定义为小脑AI > 0.1。将16个皮质区域的AI作为二分变量和连续变量,通过向后逻辑回归分析CCD的发生情况。
对于二分变量,中央后回灌注不足(优势比[OR] = 7.607;95%可信区间,2.299至25.174)和缘上回灌注不足(OR = 3.916;95%可信区间,1.394至11.003)独立影响CCD。对于连续变量,中央后回灌注不足(OR = 1.044;95%可信区间,1.019至1.068)和缘上回灌注不足(OR = 1.021;95%可信区间,1.001至1.041)(以及作为负性因素的枕内侧区;OR = 0.942;95%可信区间,0.895至0.991)独立影响CCD。
许多皮质区域显然与CCD无关。二分分析和连续分析中CCD的一致性表明,病变位置而非严重程度是CCD的主要决定因素。