• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Instrumental rotational delivery in primiparae.

作者信息

Gleeson N C, Gormally S M, Morrison J J, O'Regan M

机构信息

Rotunda Hospital, Dublin.

出版信息

Ir Med J. 1992 Dec;85(4):139-41.

PMID:1473948
Abstract

We analysed 98 consecutive instrumental rotational deliveries of babies weighing > 2,500 grams in primiparae. Our aim was to compare the use of Kjelland's forceps with vacuum delivery with regard to efficacy and safety. The vaginal delivery rate was similar with Kjelland's forceps (96%) and vacuum (90%). The vacuum cup failed to effect rotation in 14% and 77% required forceps delivery after vacuum rotation. The vacuum took longer to effect delivery (P < 0.01). Women delivered with Kjelland's forceps had higher pain scores in the puerperium. There were no perinatal deaths. Low Apgar scores and cord arterial pH values of less than 7.20 were recorded more frequently after vacuum rotation (p < 0.05). Babies delivered with Kjelland's forceps sustained more physical trauma. The incidence of asphyxial encephalopathy was the same in both groups. We would recommend a more selective approach to the use of both rotational vacuum and Kjelland's forceps in primiparae.

摘要

相似文献

1
Instrumental rotational delivery in primiparae.
Ir Med J. 1992 Dec;85(4):139-41.
2
Kjelland's forceps in the new millennium. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted rotational forceps delivery.新千年的凯兰德产钳。试产旋转产钳分娩的母婴结局。
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Oct;49(5):510-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2009.01060.x.
3
Forceps or vacuum extraction: a comparison of maternal and neonatal morbidity.产钳或真空吸引术:母婴发病率比较
East Mediterr Health J. 2001 Jan-Mar;7(1-2):106-14.
4
Cohort study of silastic obstetric vacuum cup deliveries: I. Safety of the instrument.硅橡胶产科吸引杯分娩队列研究:I. 器械安全性
Obstet Gynecol. 1985 Oct;66(4):503-9.
5
A randomised prospective trial of the obstetric forceps versus vacuum extraction using defined criteria.一项使用明确标准对产科产钳与真空吸引术进行的随机前瞻性试验。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002 Jul;22(4):344-5. doi: 10.1080/01443610220141227.
6
Instrumental delivery: clinical practice guidelines from the French College of Gynaecologists and Obstetricians.器械助产:法国妇产科学院临床实践指南。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Nov;159(1):43-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2011.06.043. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
7
Risk of new-onset urinary incontinence after forceps and vacuum delivery in primiparous women.初产妇使用产钳和真空吸引分娩后新发尿失禁的风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Dec;185(6):1318-23; discussion 1323-4. doi: 10.1067/mob.2001.120365.
8
A randomized comparison of assisted vaginal delivery by obstetric forceps and polyethylene vacuum cup.产钳与聚乙烯真空吸引杯辅助阴道分娩的随机对照研究
Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Nov;78(5 Pt 1):789-94.
9
Immediate maternal and neonatal effects of forceps and vacuum-assisted deliveries.产钳和真空辅助分娩对产妇和新生儿的即时影响。
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Mar;103(3):513-8. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000114985.22844.6d.
10
Instrumental (operative) vaginal deliveries: vacuum extraction compared with forceps delivery at Ilorin University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria.器械助产(手术助产)分娩:尼日利亚伊洛林大学教学医院真空吸引助产与产钳助产的比较
West Afr J Med. 1991 Apr-Jun;10(2):127-36.