Klein H H, Arntz H-R
Klinikum Idar-Oberstein GmbH, Dr. Ottmar-Kohler Str. 2, 55743 Idar-Oberstein, Germany.
Z Kardiol. 2004 Jan;93(1):18-22. doi: 10.1007/s00392-004-1031-y.
Setting clear priorities for the sequence and importance of actions during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is of utmost importance for future guidelines. Unless performed under the rare condition of hypoxic arrest, combined compression and ventilation is usually not necessary in one-rescuer resuscitation of adults. After notifying the emergency medical services (EMS), precordial compression at a rate of 100/min is just as effective or may even be preferable in the majority of cases caused by arrhythmic arrest. Considering the pathophysiological and experimental evidence, chest compression has proven to be more important, even in multi-rescuer settings, than resuscitation ventilation with its problems and risks. International recommendations for compression without respiration for rescuers unwilling to perform resuscitation ventilation or for so-called telephone CPR were not included in the guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council (ERC) probably for reasons of brevity and simplification. However, training for basic cardiopulmonary resuscitation of adults with cardiac arrest should also stress the importance of chest compression over ventilation. Moreover, current studies controversially discuss the optimal time point of defibrillation after collapse. These findings point to the enormous demand for research in the field of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
为心肺复苏(CPR)过程中的操作顺序和重要性设定明确的优先级对未来的指南至关重要。除非在罕见的缺氧性心脏骤停情况下进行,在成人单人复苏中通常不需要同时进行按压和通气。在通知紧急医疗服务(EMS)后,以每分钟100次的速率进行心前区按压在大多数心律失常性心脏骤停引起的病例中同样有效,甚至可能更可取。考虑到病理生理学和实验证据,事实证明,即使在多人复苏的情况下,胸外按压也比存在问题和风险的复苏通气更为重要。国际上对于不愿意进行复苏通气的救援人员或所谓电话心肺复苏不进行呼吸只做按压的建议,可能出于简洁和简化的原因未被欧洲复苏委员会(ERC)的指南所采纳。然而,针对成人心脏骤停的基本心肺复苏培训也应强调胸外按压比通气更重要。此外,目前的研究对心脏骤停后除颤的最佳时间点存在争议。这些发现表明心肺复苏领域对研究的巨大需求。