• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同消毒剂对喉镜消毒的效果

Effects of different disinfectants on decontamination of laryngoscopes.

作者信息

Tekin I, Arican I, Akcali S, Sanlidag T, Ozbakkaloglu B

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, Celal Bayar University, Turkey.

出版信息

Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2003 Oct;17(3):371-8.

PMID:14740591
Abstract

Guidelines for controlling possible contamination of laryngoscopes should be formulated with the benefit of relevant experimental data. In this study, the effects of five different disinfectants commonly used for the disinfection of laryngoscopes are evaluated. We formed 14 groups, with 10 blades in each. The first 7 groups were contaminated with hospital related meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and the remaining 7 groups with hospital related multiple resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA). For the first group of blades, no disinfection procedure was carried out and, were assumed as a control group. Blades in remaining groups were rested for 10 minutes in containers containing 70% alcohol (II), 1/100 dilution of cetrimide (III), 1/100 dilution of chlorhexidine (IV), 1/10 dilution of chlorhexidine (V), 1/10 dilution of povidone iodine (VI), and 1/100 dilution of ammonium chloride (VII). Disinfectant used in a group was considered effective when growth was seen in 5 or less than 5 plates representing that group. All disenfectants tested were found effective on decontamination of laryngoscopes. Five different moderate level disinfectants, which are commonly used for the disinfection of laryngoscopes, have been found effective even on resistant hospital microorganisms like MRSA and P. aeruginosa. They may be the choices of the disinfectants, especially 1/10 dilution of chlorhexidine gluconate and 1/100 dilution of ammonium chloride.

摘要

应利用相关实验数据制定喉镜可能污染的控制指南。在本研究中,评估了常用于喉镜消毒的五种不同消毒剂的效果。我们分成14组,每组10个喉镜镜片。前7组用医院相关的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)污染,其余7组用医院相关的多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌(PA)污染。对于第一组镜片,未进行消毒程序,将其作为对照组。其余组的镜片分别在装有70%酒精(II组)、1/100稀释度的溴化十六烷基三甲铵(III组)、1/100稀释度的洗必泰(IV组)、1/10稀释度的洗必泰(V组)、1/10稀释度的聚维酮碘(VI组)和1/100稀释度的氯化铵(VII组)的容器中放置10分钟。当代表该组的5个或少于5个培养皿中出现生长时,该组使用的消毒剂被认为有效。所有测试的消毒剂对喉镜的去污均有效。已发现常用于喉镜消毒的五种不同的中度水平消毒剂,即使对MRSA和铜绿假单胞菌等耐药医院微生物也有效。它们可能是消毒剂的选择,尤其是1/10稀释度的葡萄糖酸氯己定和1/100稀释度的氯化铵。

相似文献

1
Effects of different disinfectants on decontamination of laryngoscopes.不同消毒剂对喉镜消毒的效果
Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2003 Oct;17(3):371-8.
2
An alternative simple method in laryngoscope blade decontamination.
Middle East J Anaesthesiol. 2002 Jun;16(5):529-34.
3
Decontamination of laryngoscope blades: is our practice adequate?喉镜镜片的消毒:我们的做法是否恰当?
J Postgrad Med. 2010 Oct-Dec;56(4):257-61. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.70930.
4
Chlorhexidine to maintain cleanliness of laryngoscope handles: an audit and laboratory study.使用洗必泰保持喉镜手柄清洁:一项审计与实验室研究
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2013 May;30(5):216-21. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e3283607827.
5
Disinfection of needleless connectors with chlorhexidine-alcohol provides long-lasting residual disinfectant activity.用洗必泰-酒精消毒无针接头可提供持久的残留消毒剂活性。
Am J Infect Control. 2013 Aug;41(8):e77-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2012.10.018. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
6
Comparison of bactericidal activities of various disinfectants against methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.多种消毒剂对甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的杀菌活性比较。
Postgrad Med J. 1993;69 Suppl 3:S66-9.
7
In vitro susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus including MRSA to four disinfectants.金黄色葡萄球菌(包括耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌)对四种消毒剂的体外敏感性
ASDC J Dent Child. 1997 Jul-Aug;64(4):260-3.
8
[Evaluation of a micromethod for the bactericidal activity of five disinfectants on 108 hospital strains].[五种消毒剂对108株医院菌株杀菌活性的微量法评估]
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1993 Apr;41(4):349-57.
9
[Microbiological evaluation of chemical disinfectants for household use].[家用化学消毒剂的微生物学评价]
Rev Saude Publica. 1990 Feb;24(1):47-50. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89101990000100008.
10
Nano-TiO2-based photocatalytic disinfection of environmental surfaces contaminated by meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.基于纳米二氧化钛的耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌污染环境表面的光催化消毒
J Hosp Infect. 2016 May;93(1):78-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.01.020. Epub 2016 Feb 11.