Sevi A, Taibi L, Albenzio M, Caroprese M, Marino R, Muscio A
Dipartimento PRIME, Facoltà di Agraria, Via Napoli, 25, 71100 Foggia, Italy.
J Dairy Sci. 2003 Dec;86(12):3881-90. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73996-4.
The effects of ventilation on air quality, and on the welfare and production performance of dairy ewes were assessed in a 6-wk trial conducted during the winter of 2002. Thirty-six midlactation Comisana ewes were divided into three groups of 12, which were randomly balanced for parity, time of lambing, and number of lambs suckled. Treatments were low (LOV), moderate (MOV), and programmed ventilation regimen (PROV). In LOV and MOV rooms, fans provided 10 ventilation cycles of 40 min each at a fan speed of 1 and 2 m/s, respectively. In the PROV room, the fan was programmed to maintain a 70% relative humidity. Mean ventilation rates were 23, 47, and 73 m3/h per ewe in LOV, MOV, and PROV rooms, respectively. Air concentrations of microorganisms and dust, and of gaseous pollutants were measured twice weekly. Cell-mediated immune response to phytohemagglutinin at d 1, 21 and 42, and humoral response to chicken egg albumin at d 11, 21, 30, and 40 were determined. At d 39, ewes were injected with 2 IU of porcine adreno-corticotropic-hormone/kg body weight(0.75), and subjected to blood sampling for evaluation of cortisol concentrations immediately before and 1, 2, and 4 h after adreno-corticotrophic-hormone injection. Milk yield was recorded daily. Individual milk samples were analyzed weekly for composition, renneting parameters, and somatic cell count. The LOV treatment resulted in higher air concentrations of NH3 and CO2 than the MOV and PROV treatments. Greater amounts of total and respirable dust were found in the PROV room than in the LOV and the MOV rooms. The LOV ewes had lower milk yield than the PROV ewes, lower milk casein content, and higher rate of clot formation than the MOV and PROV ewes. The ventilation regimen did not affect the immune and endocrine responses of the ewes. Results suggest that an intermittent ventilation regimen, providing a mean ventilation rate of 47 m3/h per ewe at a fan speed of 2 m/s, is required to sustain the yield and cheese-making ability of ewe milk during the winter season.
2002年冬季进行了一项为期6周的试验,评估了通风对空气质量以及对泌乳中期科米萨纳奶羊福利和生产性能的影响。36只泌乳中期的科米萨纳奶羊被分为3组,每组12只,根据胎次、产羔时间和哺乳羔羊数量进行随机均衡分组。处理方式为低通风量(LOV)、中等通风量(MOV)和程序控制通风方案(PROV)。在LOV和MOV房间,风扇分别以1米/秒和2米/秒的风速提供10个时长均为40分钟的通风循环。在PROV房间,风扇被设定为维持70%的相对湿度。LOV、MOV和PROV房间每只奶羊的平均通风率分别为23立方米/小时、47立方米/小时和73立方米/小时。每周两次测量空气中微生物、灰尘和气态污染物的浓度。在第1天、21天和42天测定对植物血凝素的细胞介导免疫反应,在第11天、21天、30天和40天测定对鸡卵白蛋白的体液免疫反应。在第39天,给奶羊注射2国际单位/千克体重的猪促肾上腺皮质激素(0.75),并在注射促肾上腺皮质激素前以及注射后1小时、2小时和4小时进行采血,以评估皮质醇浓度。每天记录产奶量。每周对个体奶样进行成分、凝乳参数和体细胞计数分析。与MOV和PROV处理相比,LOV处理导致空气中氨气和二氧化碳浓度更高。与LOV和MOV房间相比,PROV房间发现的总灰尘量和可吸入灰尘量更多。LOV组奶羊的产奶量低于PROV组奶羊,乳中酪蛋白含量较低,与MOV和PROV组奶羊相比凝块形成率更高。通风方案对奶羊的免疫和内分泌反应没有影响。结果表明,在冬季,需要一种间歇通风方案,以2米/秒的风速为每只奶羊提供平均47立方米/小时的通风率,来维持奶羊的产奶量和羊奶用于制作奶酪的能力。