Berry E A, Johnston W T, Hillerton J E
Institute for Animal Health, Compton, Newbury, Berkshire RG20 7NN UK.
J Dairy Sci. 2003 Dec;86(12):3912-9. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(03)73999-X.
Infusion of a long-acting antibiotic preparation at drying off in dairy cows as a prophylactic therapy is usually recommended for all quarters where it is in use. Studying the effectiveness of such treatment using quarter as the unit of analysis assumes that each quarter within a cow has a risk of being infected independent of the other quarters of the cow. Failure to account for interdependence of quarters within a cow may lead to inaccurate variance estimates and errors in assessing treatment effects. Data from two trials assessing different dry-cow strategies were examined for interdependence of infection between quarters. Logistic regression with a variance inflation factor or a multilevel analysis was used to assess the effect of antibiotic and internal teat-sealant dry cow strategies. Parity and infection status at drying off were covariates in the analysis. Interdependence of the risk of quarter infections within control-group cows was demonstrated in both dry-cow antibiotic and teat-seal trials. However, cows that received either of these treatments did not demonstrate interdependence. Treated quarters in both trials were 3.0 times less likely to acquire a new infection at calving compared with the untreated controls. Quarters in cows of parity 3 or greater were also at an increased risk in the antibiotic treatment trial. In both trials, quarters with either Corynebacterium spp. or coagulase-negative staphylococci infections at drying off had an increased risk of a new intramammary infection at calving. This study has demonstrated the beneficial and comparable effects of antibiotic and teat seal dry cow strategies; both decreased the risk of intramammary infection at calving. The application of dry-cow strategies at the cow level and not the quarter level is also supported.
对于泌乳奶牛,通常建议在干奶期对所有使用长效抗生素制剂进行预防性治疗的乳区给药。以乳区作为分析单位研究此类治疗的有效性时,假设奶牛的每个乳区被感染的风险相互独立,不受奶牛其他乳区的影响。未考虑奶牛乳区之间的相互依存关系可能导致方差估计不准确,并在评估治疗效果时出现误差。对两项评估不同干奶策略的试验数据进行分析,以检验乳区之间感染的相互依存关系。采用带有方差膨胀因子的逻辑回归或多水平分析来评估抗生素和乳头内封闭剂干奶策略的效果。分析中,将产犊时的胎次和感染状况作为协变量。在干奶期抗生素试验和乳头封闭试验中,均证实了对照组奶牛乳区感染风险的相互依存关系。然而,接受这两种治疗之一的奶牛并未表现出相互依存关系。在两项试验中,与未治疗的对照组相比,接受治疗的乳区在产犊时发生新感染的可能性降低了3.0倍。在抗生素治疗试验中,胎次为3或更高的奶牛的乳区感染风险也有所增加。在两项试验中,干奶期感染棒状杆菌属或凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌的乳区,在产犊时发生新的乳房内感染的风险增加。本研究证实了抗生素和乳头封闭干奶策略具有有益且相当的效果;两者均降低了产犊时乳房内感染的风险。同时也支持在奶牛水平而非乳区水平应用干奶策略。