Blake Diane R, Gaydos Charlotte A, Quinn Thomas C
Department of Pediatrics, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts 01655, USA.
Sex Transm Dis. 2004 Feb;31(2):85-95. doi: 10.1097/01.OLQ.0000109517.07062.FC.
Chlamydia trachomatis infections can lead to serious and costly sequelae. Because chlamydia is most often asymptomatic, many infected youth do not seek testing. Entry to a detention system provides an opportunity to screen and treat many at-risk youth. GOAL The goal of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of screening male youth for chlamydia on entry to detention.
Incremental cost-effectiveness of 3 chlamydia screening strategies was compared for a hypothetical cohort of 4000 male youth per year: 1) universal chlamydia screening using a urine-based nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT), 2) selective NAAT screening of urine leukocyte esterase (LE)-positive urines, and 3) no screening. The model incorporated programmatic costs of screening and treatment and medical cost savings from sequelae prevented in infected males and female partners. The analysis was conducted from the healthcare system perspective.
Chlamydia prevalence in the sampled population of 594 was 4.8%, and the average number of female sexual partners/infected male was 1.6. Universal NAAT screening was the most cost-effective strategy, preventing 37 more cases of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) and 3 more cases of epididymitis than selective screening and saving an additional 24,000 dollars. The analysis was sensitive to NAAT cost, LE sensitivity, rate of PID development, PID sequelae cost, and number of female partners. Universal screening remained the most cost saving for prevalence as low as 2.8% or higher.
Universal chlamydia screening of adolescent males on entry to detention was the most cost-effective strategy. Savings are primarily the result of the prevention of PID in recent and future partners of index males. Screening detained male youth using a urine-based NAAT provides a public health opportunity to significantly reduce chlamydia infections in youth at risk for sexually transmitted diseases.
沙眼衣原体感染可导致严重且代价高昂的后遗症。由于衣原体感染通常无症状,许多受感染的青少年未寻求检测。进入拘留系统为筛查和治疗许多高危青少年提供了机会。
本研究的目标是确定在男性青少年进入拘留所时筛查衣原体的成本效益。
比较了三种衣原体筛查策略对每年4000名男性青少年假设队列的增量成本效益:1)使用基于尿液的核酸扩增试验(NAAT)进行普遍衣原体筛查;2)对尿液白细胞酯酶(LE)阳性尿液进行选择性NAAT筛查;3)不进行筛查。该模型纳入了筛查和治疗的项目成本以及因预防受感染男性及其女性伴侣的后遗症而节省的医疗成本。分析是从医疗保健系统的角度进行的。
在594名抽样人群中,衣原体患病率为4.8%,每名受感染男性的女性性伴侣平均数量为1.6。普遍NAAT筛查是最具成本效益的策略,比选择性筛查多预防37例盆腔炎(PID)和3例附睾炎,并额外节省24000美元。该分析对NAAT成本、LE敏感性、PID发生率、PID后遗症成本和女性伴侣数量敏感。对于低至2.8%或更高的患病率,普遍筛查仍然是最节省成本的。
在青少年男性进入拘留所时进行普遍衣原体筛查是最具成本效益的策略。节省主要是由于预防了索引男性近期和未来伴侣中的PID。使用基于尿液的NAAT筛查被拘留的男性青少年提供了一个公共卫生机会,可显著减少有性传播疾病风险的青少年中的衣原体感染。