Turner K M E, Adams E J, Lamontagne D S, Emmett L, Baster K, Edmunds W J
Health Protection Agency, Centre for Infections, 61 Colindale Ave, Colindale, London NW9 5EQ, UK.
Sex Transm Infect. 2006 Dec;82(6):496-502. doi: 10.1136/sti.2005.019067.
Several developed countries have initiated chlamydia screening programmes. Screening for a sexually transmitted infection has both direct individual and indirect population-wide effects. Mathematical models can incorporate these non-linear effects and estimate the likely impact of different screening programmes and identify areas where more data are needed.
A stochastic, individual based dynamic network model, parameterised from UK screening studies and data on sexual behaviour and chlamydia epidemiology, was used to investigate the likely impact of opportunistic screening on chlamydia prevalence. Three main strategies were considered for <25 year olds: (1) annual offer to women; (2) annual offer to women or if changed partner within last 6 months; (3) annual offer to men and women. Sensitivity analyses were performed for key screening parameters including uptake rate, targeted age range, percentage of partners notified, and screening interval.
Under strategy 1, continuous opportunistic screening of women <25 years of age is expected to reduce the population prevalence by over 50% after 5 years. Prevalence is also expected to decrease in unscreened older women and in men. For all three strategies screening those aged over 25 results in small additional reductions in prevalence. Including men led to a faster and greater reduction in overall prevalence, but involved approximately twice as many tests as strategy 1 and 10% more than strategy 2. The frequency of attendance at healthcare sites limits the number of opportunities to screen and the effect of changing the screening interval.
The model suggests that continuous opportunistic screening at high uptake rates could significantly reduced chlamydia prevalence within a few years. Opportunistic programmes depend on regular attendance at healthcare providers, but there is a lack of high quality data on patterns of attendance. Inequalities in coverage may result in a less efficient and less equitable outcome.
几个发达国家已启动衣原体筛查项目。对性传播感染进行筛查具有直接的个体效应和间接的全人群效应。数学模型可以纳入这些非线性效应,估计不同筛查项目可能产生的影响,并确定需要更多数据的领域。
使用一个基于个体的随机动态网络模型,该模型根据英国的筛查研究以及性行为和衣原体流行病学数据进行参数化,以研究机会性筛查对衣原体患病率可能产生的影响。针对25岁以下人群考虑了三种主要策略:(1)每年向女性提供筛查;(2)每年向女性提供筛查,或者在过去6个月内更换性伴侣的女性;(3)每年向男性和女性提供筛查。对关键筛查参数进行了敏感性分析,包括接受率、目标年龄范围、性伴侣通知百分比和筛查间隔。
在策略1下,对25岁以下女性进行持续的机会性筛查预计5年后人群患病率将降低50%以上。未筛查的老年女性和男性的患病率预计也会下降。对于所有三种策略,对25岁以上人群进行筛查会使患病率有小幅额外降低。纳入男性导致总体患病率下降更快、幅度更大,但检测次数约为策略1的两倍,比策略2多10%。到医疗机构就诊的频率限制了筛查机会的数量以及改变筛查间隔的效果。
该模型表明,高接受率的持续机会性筛查在几年内可显著降低衣原体患病率。机会性筛查项目依赖于定期到医疗服务提供者处就诊,但缺乏关于就诊模式的高质量数据。覆盖范围的不平等可能导致效率降低和公平性下降的结果。