• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

头孢克洛引起的血清病样反应。

Serum sickness-like reactions to cefaclor.

作者信息

Stricker B H, Tijssen J G

机构信息

Netherlands Center for Monitoring of Adverse Reactions to Drugs, Rijswijk.

出版信息

J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;45(10):1177-84. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90158-j.

DOI:10.1016/0895-4356(92)90158-j
PMID:1474414
Abstract

In this study, we evaluated whether the high number of reports of serum sickness to cefaclor was present in every country and year, and whether these figures from voluntary reporting facilitated an estimation of the relative risk. A nested case-control study was performed with reports of all suspected adverse reactions (ADR) to cefaclor, amoxicillin and cephalexin in the period 1968-1987, as reported to the WHO Collaborating Center for International Drug Monitoring from the U.S.A., the U.K., Sweden, Canada and Germany. The ADR-reporting odds ratio was defined as the ratio of the odds of the number of ADR-reports of serum sickness to cefaclor and amoxicillin or cephalexin and the odds of similar reports of non-serum sickness to cefaclor and amoxicillin or cephalexin. The ADR-reporting odds ratio adjusted for country, age, gender, origin of the report and year of marketing was 12.4 for cefaclor vs amoxicillin and 18.5 for cefaclor vs cephalexin. In children (< 15 years of age) and in adults (> 15 years of age), the relative risk of developing serum sickness of cefaclor vs amoxicillin was estimated at 13.9 (95% confidence interval (95% CI): 6.0-32.2) and 2.9 (95% CI: 0.9-9.4) respectively in the U.S.A., and at 15.1 (95% CI: 7.2-31.5) and 5.5 (95% CI: 2.0-15.0) respectively in the other four countries together. In this study, the ADR-reporting odds ratio facilitated a valid estimation of the relative risk.

摘要

在本研究中,我们评估了各国每年头孢克洛血清病报告数量是否居高不下,以及这些来自自愿报告的数据能否用于估计相对风险。我们开展了一项巢式病例对照研究,研究对象为1968年至1987年期间向世界卫生组织国际药品监测合作中心报告的所有疑似头孢克洛、阿莫西林和头孢氨苄不良反应(ADR),这些报告来自美国、英国、瑞典、加拿大和德国。ADR报告比值比定义为头孢克洛血清病ADR报告数与阿莫西林或头孢氨苄报告数的比值,以及头孢克洛和阿莫西林或头孢氨苄非血清病类似报告数的比值。针对国家、年龄、性别、报告来源和上市年份进行调整后,头孢克洛与阿莫西林的ADR报告比值比为12.4,头孢克洛与头孢氨苄的ADR报告比值比为18.5。在美国,儿童(<15岁)和成人(>15岁)中,头孢克洛与阿莫西林相比发生血清病的相对风险估计分别为13.9(95%置信区间(95%CI):6.0 - 32.2)和2.9(95%CI:0.9 - 9.4),在其他四个国家总体中分别为15.1(95%CI:7.2 - 31.5)和5.5(95%CI:2.0 - 15.0)。在本研究中,ADR报告比值比有助于有效估计相对风险。

相似文献

1
Serum sickness-like reactions to cefaclor.头孢克洛引起的血清病样反应。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;45(10):1177-84. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(92)90158-j.
2
Serum sickness-like reactions to amoxicillin, cefaclor, cephalexin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.阿莫西林、头孢克洛、头孢氨苄和甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑引起的血清病样反应。
J Infect Dis. 1988 Aug;158(2):474-7. doi: 10.1093/infdis/158.2.474.
3
Serum sickness in children after antibiotic exposure: estimates of occurrence and morbidity in a health maintenance organization population.抗生素暴露后儿童血清病:健康维护组织人群中的发生率和发病率估计
Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Aug;132(2):336-42. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115663.
4
Quantitative comparison of adverse reactions to cefaclor vs. amoxicillin in a surveillance study.一项监测研究中头孢克洛与阿莫西林不良反应的定量比较。
Pediatr Infect Dis. 1985 Jul-Aug;4(4):358-61. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198507000-00005.
5
Serum sickness-like reactions to cefaclor: role of hepatic metabolism and individual susceptibility.头孢克洛引起的血清病样反应:肝脏代谢及个体易感性的作用
J Pediatr. 1994 Nov;125(5 Pt 1):805-11.
6
Serum sickness like illness and antimicrobials in children.儿童血清病样疾病与抗菌药物
N Z Med J. 1995 Apr 12;108(997):123-4.
7
Cefaclor serum sickness-like reactions: report of a case and review of the literature.头孢克洛血清病样反应:一例报告及文献复习
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1985 Jul;85(7):450-2.
8
Serum sickness in a child treated with cefaclor.一名使用头孢克洛治疗的儿童发生血清病。
J Ark Med Soc. 1983 Jul;80(2):110.
9
Serum sickness with cefaclor.头孢克洛所致血清病
Can Med Assoc J. 1982 May 1;126(9):1032.
10
Cefaclor reactions.头孢克洛反应。
Pediatr Infect Dis. 1985 Nov-Dec;4(6):706. doi: 10.1097/00006454-198511000-00038.

引用本文的文献

1
The reporting of disproportionality analysis in pharmacovigilance: spotlight on the READUS-PV guideline.药物警戒中不成比例性分析的报告:聚焦于READUS-PV指南。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Nov 27;15:1488725. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1488725. eCollection 2024.
2
A discovery and verification approach to pharmacovigilance using electronic healthcare data.一种利用电子医疗数据进行药物警戒的发现与验证方法。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Sep 4;15:1426323. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1426323. eCollection 2024.
3
Pharmacovigilance analysis of orlistat adverse events based on the FDA adverse event reporting system (FAERS) database.
基于美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库的奥利司他不良事件的药物警戒分析。
Heliyon. 2024 Jul 18;10(14):e34837. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34837. eCollection 2024 Jul 30.
4
Dermatologic toxicities in epidermal growth factor receptor: a comprehensive pharmacovigilance study from 2013 to 2023.表皮生长因子受体相关的皮肤毒性:一项2013年至2023年的综合药物警戒研究
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Jan 24;10:1283807. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1283807. eCollection 2023.
5
Hepatotoxicity in immune checkpoint inhibitors: A pharmacovigilance study from 2014-2021.免疫检查点抑制剂的肝毒性:一项 2014-2021 年的药物警戒研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 7;18(3):e0281983. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281983. eCollection 2023.
6
Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation and Mycobacterial Infections Associated With Ustekinumab: A Retrospective Study of an International Pharmacovigilance Database.与优特克单抗相关的乙型肝炎病毒再激活和分枝杆菌感染:一项国际药物警戒数据库的回顾性研究
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Jul 4;13:921084. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.921084. eCollection 2022.
7
Risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation following treatment with abatacept: A retrospective study of international pharmacovigilance databases.阿巴西普治疗后乙型肝炎病毒再激活的风险:一项对国际药物警戒数据库的回顾性研究。
EClinicalMedicine. 2022 May 5;48:101425. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101425. eCollection 2022 Jun.
8
Age-Associated Risk of Liver-Related Adverse Drug Reactions.年龄相关的肝脏相关药物不良反应风险
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Mar 17;9:832557. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.832557. eCollection 2022.
9
Safety of BRAF+MEK Inhibitor Combinations: Severe Adverse Event Evaluation.BRAF+MEK抑制剂联合用药的安全性:严重不良事件评估。
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jun 22;12(6):1650. doi: 10.3390/cancers12061650.
10
Benzodiazepine-Related Cognitive Impairment or Dementia: A Signal Detection Study Using a Case/Non-Case Approach.苯二氮䓬类药物相关的认知障碍或痴呆:一项采用病例/非病例方法的信号检测研究。
Psychiatry Investig. 2020 Jun;17(6):587-595. doi: 10.30773/pi.2019.0275. Epub 2020 May 27.