Suppr超能文献

对边缘型人格障碍患者和轴II对照受试者的心理健康服务利用情况进行了为期6年的前瞻性随访。

Mental health service utilization by borderline personality disorder patients and Axis II comparison subjects followed prospectively for 6 years.

作者信息

Zanarini Mary C, Frankenburg Frances R, Hennen John, Silk Kenneth R

机构信息

Laboratory for the Study of Adult Development, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA 02478, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;65(1):28-36. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v65n0105.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe the psychiatric treatment received by a well-defined sample of patients with borderline personality disorder and Axis II comparison subjects over 6 years of prospective follow-up.

METHOD

362 inpatients were interviewed about their treatment histories during their index admission (1992-1995). 290 patients met both Revised Diagnostic Interview for Borderlines and DSM-III-R criteria for borderline personality disorder and 72 met DSM-III-R criteria for at least 1 nonborderline Axis II disorder (and neither criteria set for borderline personality disorder). Over 94% of surviving patients were re-interviewed about their psychiatric treatment histories 2, 4, and 6 years later.

RESULTS

Only 33% of borderline patients were hospitalized during the final 2 years of the 6-year follow-up, a substantial decline from the 79% who had prior hospitalizations at baseline. Much the same pattern emerged for day and/or residential treatment (from 55% to 22%). In contrast, about three quarters of borderline patients were still in psychotherapy and taking psychotropic medications after 6 years of follow-up. Additionally, over 70% of borderline patients participating in these outpatient modalities did so for at least 75% of each follow-up period. While rates of intensive psychotherapy declined significantly over time (from 36% to 16%), rates of intensive polypharmacy remained relatively stable over time, with about 40% of borderline patients taking 3 or more concurrent standing medications during each follow-up period, about 20% taking 4 or more, and about 10% taking 5 or more.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study suggest that the majority of borderline patients continue to use outpatient treatment in a sustained manner through 6 years of follow-up, but only a declining minority use more restrictive and costly forms of treatment.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在描述一组明确界定的边缘型人格障碍患者样本以及轴II对照受试者在6年的前瞻性随访中接受的精神科治疗情况。

方法

对362名住院患者在其首次入院期间(1992 - 1995年)的治疗史进行了访谈。290名患者符合《边缘型人格障碍修订诊断访谈》和DSM - III - R边缘型人格障碍标准,72名患者符合DSM - III - R至少一种非边缘型轴II障碍标准(且不符合边缘型人格障碍的任何标准)。在6年后,对超过94%的存活患者再次进行访谈,了解他们的精神科治疗史。

结果

在6年随访的最后2年中,只有33%的边缘型患者住院,与基线时79%有过住院治疗的患者相比大幅下降。日间和/或住院治疗也出现了大致相同的模式(从55%降至22%)。相比之下,约四分之三的边缘型患者在随访6年后仍在接受心理治疗并服用精神药物。此外,参与这些门诊治疗方式的边缘型患者中,超过70%在每个随访期至少75%的时间里接受治疗。虽然强化心理治疗的比例随时间显著下降(从36%降至16%),但强化联合用药的比例随时间保持相对稳定,约40%的边缘型患者在每个随访期服用3种或更多同时使用的常备药物,约20%服用4种或更多,约10%服用5种或更多。

结论

本研究结果表明,大多数边缘型患者在6年的随访中持续采用门诊治疗,但只有越来越少的患者使用更具限制性和成本更高的治疗形式。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验