• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

需求式氧气输送系统的特点:最大输出量及设置建议。

Characteristics of demand oxygen delivery systems: maximum output and setting recommendations.

作者信息

Bliss Peter L, McCoy Robert W, Adams Alexander B

机构信息

Department of Pulmonary/Critical Care Medicine, Regions Hospital, St Paul, Minnesota, USA.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2004 Feb;49(2):160-5.

PMID:14744265
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Demand oxygen delivery systems (DODS) allot oxygen by interrupting the oxygen flow during exhalation, when it would mostly be wasted. Because DODS conserve oxygen by various methods, there are important performance differences between DODS. We studied certain performance factors that have not previously been carefully examined.

METHODS

A bench model was constructed to simulate a nose, airway, and alveolar chamber. A breathing simulator generated 4 respiratory patterns, at frequencies of 15, 20, 25, and 30 breaths/min. Eighteen models of DODS were tested at 4 settings, each up to the maximum output, and compared to continuous-flow oxygen. The variable of interest was the fraction of inspired oxygen (F(I)O(2)) in the alveolar chamber, which was measured for each condition.

RESULTS

The DODS differed from continuous-flow oxygen, delivering 0.5-2.1 times (mean = 1.13 times) the F(I)O(2) increase at similar settings. During maximum output the DODS showed a wide range of F(I)O(2), from 0.27 to 0.46. There was a direct relationship between volume output per pulse in the first 0.6 s of inhalation and the delivered F(I)O(2).

CONCLUSIONS

DODS settings were not equivalent to continuous-flow oxygen in a bench model assessment; with equivalent settings the DODS tended to deliver greater F(I)O(2) than did continuous-flow oxygen. The maximum output capacity differed markedly among the DODS, and the user should know the device's capacity. A volume-referenced setting system for DODS should be adopted that would allow more predictable oxygen prescription and delivery via DODS.

摘要

背景

按需给氧系统(DODS)通过在呼气期间中断氧流来分配氧气,因为此时氧气大多会被浪费。由于DODS通过各种方法节约氧气,所以不同的DODS在性能上存在重要差异。我们研究了一些此前未被仔细研究过的性能因素。

方法

构建了一个模拟鼻子、气道和肺泡腔的实验台模型。一个呼吸模拟器以每分钟15、20、25和30次呼吸的频率产生4种呼吸模式。对18种DODS模型在4种设置下进行测试,每种设置均达到最大输出,并与连续流氧气进行比较。感兴趣的变量是肺泡腔内的吸入氧分数(F(I)O(2)),针对每种情况进行测量。

结果

DODS与连续流氧气不同,在相似设置下,其F(I)O(2)增加量为连续流氧气的0.5 - 2.1倍(平均为1.13倍)。在最大输出时,DODS的F(I)O(2)范围很广,从0.27到0.46。吸气开始的0.6秒内每个脉冲的输出量与输送的F(I)O(2)之间存在直接关系。

结论

在实验台模型评估中,DODS的设置与连续流氧气不等同;在同等设置下,DODS输送的F(I)O(2)往往比连续流氧气更高。不同DODS的最大输出能力差异显著,用户应了解设备的能力。应采用一种基于体积的DODS设置系统,以便通过DODS实现更可预测的氧气处方和输送。

相似文献

1
Characteristics of demand oxygen delivery systems: maximum output and setting recommendations.需求式氧气输送系统的特点:最大输出量及设置建议。
Respir Care. 2004 Feb;49(2):160-5.
2
Maintaining oxygenation via demand oxygen delivery during rest and exercise.在休息和运动期间通过按需供氧维持氧合。
Respir Care. 2002 Aug;47(8):887-92.
3
Performance comparison of 4 portable oxygen concentrators.4 种便携氧气浓缩器的性能比较。
Respir Care. 2010 Apr;55(4):433-42.
4
[Efficacy of demand oxygen delivery systems in patients with chronic obstructive lung disease].[按需输氧系统对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的疗效]
Pneumologie. 2001 Jun;55(6):306-10. doi: 10.1055/s-2001-14674.
5
Performance of six types of oxygen delivery devices at varying respiratory rates.六种类型的输氧设备在不同呼吸频率下的性能。
Anaesthesia. 2007 May;62(5):492-503. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05026.x.
6
[Usefulness of demand oxygen delivery system for patients with chronic respiratory failure due to mainly tuberculosis sequelae].[按需给氧系统对主要因肺结核后遗症导致慢性呼吸衰竭患者的有效性]
Kekkaku. 1990 Nov;65(11):693-9.
7
Nocturnal oxygenation using a pulsed-dose oxygen-conserving device compared to continuous flow.使用脉冲剂量氧保存装置与持续气流相比的夜间氧合情况。
Respir Care. 2006 Mar;51(3):252-6.
8
Factors affecting oxygen delivery with bi-level positive airway pressure.影响双水平气道正压通气氧输送的因素。
Respir Care. 2004 Mar;49(3):270-5.
9
Performance of oxygen delivery devices when the breathing pattern of respiratory failure is simulated.模拟呼吸衰竭呼吸模式时氧气输送装置的性能。
Anaesthesia. 2008 Sep;63(9):938-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05536.x. Epub 2008 Jun 6.
10
A randomized crossover pilot study comparing the efficacy of an auto-demand oxygen delivery system with that of a conventional demand oxygen delivery system in patients with chronic respiratory failure.一项比较自动按需供氧系统与传统按需供氧系统在慢性呼吸衰竭患者中的疗效的随机交叉先导研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Sep 17;100(37):e27191. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027191.

引用本文的文献

1
2023 Year in Review: Home Oxygen Therapy.2023 年度回顾:家庭氧疗。
Respir Care. 2024 Aug 24;69(9):1182-1188. doi: 10.4187/respcare.12070.
2
Life cycle of medical oxygen from production to consumption.医用氧气从生产到消费的生命周期。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2022 Apr;11(4):1231-1236. doi: 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_956_21. Epub 2022 Mar 18.
3
Efficacy and safety of oxygen-sparing nasal reservoir cannula for treatment of pediatric hypoxemic pneumonia in Uganda: a pilot randomized clinical trial.在乌干达,用节省氧气的鼻腔储氧管治疗儿童低氧血症性肺炎的疗效和安全性:一项试点随机临床试验。
BMC Pulm Med. 2020 Aug 31;20(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-01267-8.
4
Contemporary portable oxygen concentrators and diverse breathing behaviours -- a bench comparison.当代便携式氧气浓缩器与不同呼吸行为——一项台架对比研究。
BMC Pulm Med. 2019 Nov 19;19(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12890-019-0980-x.
5
Perceived Satisfaction With Long-Term Oxygen Delivery Devices Affects Perceived Mobility and Quality of Life of Oxygen-Dependent Individuals With COPD.对长期氧疗设备的感知满意度会影响慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)吸氧患者的感知活动能力和生活质量。
Respir Care. 2018 Jan;63(1):11-19. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05487. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
6
Comparison of pulsed versus continuous oxygen delivery using realistic adult nasal airway replicas.使用逼真的成人鼻腔气道模型比较脉冲式与持续式氧气输送。
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2017 Aug 24;12:2559-2571. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S141976. eCollection 2017.
7
Long-Term Oxygen Therapy in COPD: Factors Affecting and Ways of Improving Patient Compliance.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的长期氧疗:影响患者依从性的因素及改善方法
Pulm Med. 2011;2011:325362. doi: 10.1155/2011/325362. Epub 2011 Sep 15.
8
Critical comparisons of the clinical performance of oxygen-conserving devices.氧气储存装置的临床性能的关键比较。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 May 15;181(10):1061-71. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200910-1638OC. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
9
Long-term oxygen therapy: are we prescribing appropriately?长期氧疗:我们的处方是否恰当?
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2008;3(2):231-7. doi: 10.2147/copd.s1230.