Katz Dana, McGahan John P, Gerscovich Eugenio O, Troxel Scott A, Low Roger K
Department of Urology, University of California-Davis, 4860 Y Street, Suite #5300, Sacramento, CA 95817, USA.
J Endourol. 2003 Dec;17(10):847-50. doi: 10.1089/089277903772036118.
The practice of utilizing helical CT to evaluate patients suspected of renal colic is increasing. Little is known about the accuracy of CT in estimating stone size or the utility of an accompanying plain abdominal radiograph (KUB film). The purpose of our study was to compare ureteral stone size estimation by helical CT and plain film and determine whether a KUB film provides additional information useful in patient management.
Thirty consecutive patients (17 male, 13 female) having both a helical CT and a KUB study for evaluation of renal colic secondary to ureteral calculi comprised the study population. Calculus number, location, and dimensions were determined from these images. Stone dimensions were measured using electronic calipers on a picture archiving and communications system. Information found by KUB and CT was compared, and both sets of stone measurements were correlated with patient outcome.
The mean maximal stone transverse diameter and length were similar on CT and plain film: 5.8 mm v 5.8 mm and 9.5 mm v 8.9 mm, respectively (P = 0.57 and 0.29, respectively). The mean anteroposterior stone diameter on CT of 6.8 mm was statistically greater than the transverse diameter as measured by both CT and KUB, which were 5.8 mm and 5.8 mm (P = 0.0002 and 0.0007, respectively). Eleven patients spontaneously passed their stones, while 19 patients required intervention. Patient outcome, as predicted by transverse stone width, was similar for CT and KUB data.
The management of patients with ureteral calculi relies on estimated stone size and the stone's potential for spontaneous passage. Stone dimensions estimated by CT are similar to the size determined by plain film radiography. Although plain film radiography does not provide information on stone dimensions beyond that obtained with CT, it does reveal precise stone location and radiolucency, data helpful in following and treating patients.
利用螺旋CT评估疑似肾绞痛患者的做法日益增多。关于CT在估计结石大小方面的准确性或附带的腹部平片(KUB片)的效用,人们了解甚少。我们研究的目的是比较螺旋CT和平片对输尿管结石大小的估计,并确定KUB片是否能提供有助于患者管理的额外信息。
连续30例患者(17例男性,13例女性)因输尿管结石继发肾绞痛接受了螺旋CT和KUB检查,构成了研究人群。从这些图像中确定结石数量、位置和尺寸。使用图像存档与通信系统上的电子卡尺测量结石尺寸。比较KUB和CT所发现的信息,并将两组结石测量值与患者的治疗结果相关联。
CT和平片上结石的平均最大横向直径和长度相似:分别为5.8毫米对5.8毫米和9.5毫米对8.9毫米(P值分别为0.57和0.29)。CT上结石的平均前后径为6.8毫米,在统计学上大于CT和KUB测量的横向直径,分别为5.8毫米和5.8毫米(P值分别为0.0002和0.0007)。11例患者结石自行排出,19例患者需要干预。根据结石横向宽度预测的患者治疗结果,CT和KUB数据相似。
输尿管结石患者的治疗依赖于估计的结石大小和结石自行排出的可能性。CT估计的结石尺寸与平片确定的尺寸相似。虽然平片摄影不能提供超出CT所获得的结石尺寸信息,但它确实能显示结石的确切位置和透X线性,这些数据有助于对患者进行跟踪和治疗。