Howe A, Owen-Smith V, Richardson J
Greater Manchester Strategic Health Authority, Gateway House, Piccadilly House, Manchester M60 7LP, UK.
J Med Screen. 2003;10(4):184-8. doi: 10.1258/096914103771773285.
To evaluate the impact of health authority cervical screening programmes upon the the actual screening interval for women attending as a result of routine recall and to assess the impact of general practice recall policies on attendance for smears.
Nine health authorities constituting the Lancashire and Greater Manchester zones of the North West region on the National Health Service.
Information was obtained on the invitation and recall policies of each health authority. A retrospective analysis of information held on cervical screening databases ("Exeter" computer systems was performed. The proportions of smears, classified by a screening interval of "unscheduled", "on-time" or "overdue", in the different health authority recall programmes were compared. General practices in one health authority (operating five-yearly recall) were contacted to determine their current practice screening policy.
Women who were invited as part of a three-yearly recall programme were more likely to attend for smears at intervals of 3-5 years than those on a five-yearly recall programme (68% vs 47%). Those health authorities operating three-yearly recall that issued recall invitations to women more than four weeks before the date the smear was due had higher rates of "unscheduled" smears. In the one health authority (operating a five-yearly recall programme) in which we determined general practice screening policy, 62% of the general practitioners (GPs) were operating their own three-yearly recall policy; these GPs had a higher proportion of the women who attended for smears "on-time" (51%) than did those who relied on the health authority five-yearly recall procedure (44%).
Despite the cervical screening programme being a national programme, there is scope at a local level for considerable variation in the interpretation of national guidance. This variation effects the extent to which programmes comply with the requirement to screen all women at an interval of 3-5 years.
评估卫生部门宫颈筛查项目对因常规召回而就诊的女性实际筛查间隔的影响,并评估全科医生召回政策对涂片检查就诊率的影响。
英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中构成西北地区兰开夏郡和大曼彻斯特区的九个卫生部门。
获取了每个卫生部门的邀请和召回政策信息。对宫颈筛查数据库(“埃克塞特”计算机系统)中保存的信息进行回顾性分析。比较了不同卫生部门召回项目中按“不定期”、“按时”或“逾期”筛查间隔分类的涂片比例。联系了一个卫生部门(实施五年召回)的全科医生,以确定他们当前的筛查政策。
作为三年召回项目一部分被邀请的女性,比起参加五年召回项目的女性,更有可能每3至5年进行一次涂片检查(68%对47%)。那些实施三年召回且在涂片到期日期前四周以上向女性发出召回邀请的卫生部门,“不定期”涂片的比例更高。在我们确定了全科医生筛查政策的一个卫生部门(实施五年召回项目)中,62%的全科医生实施自己的三年召回政策;这些全科医生让“按时”进行涂片检查的女性比例(51%)高于那些依赖卫生部门五年召回程序的医生(44%)。
尽管宫颈筛查项目是一个全国性项目,但在地方层面,对国家指南的解释仍有很大差异的空间。这种差异影响了项目符合每3至5年对所有女性进行筛查这一要求的程度。