Lupton Joanne R
Faculty of Nutrition, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-2471, USA.
J Nutr. 2004 Feb;134(2):479-82. doi: 10.1093/jn/134.2.479.
All dietary fiber, by definition, escapes digestion in the small intestine and thus arrives relatively intact in the large intestine. Its fate in the large intestine depends upon the type of fiber and the colonic microflora. Highly fermentable fibers result in short chain fatty acids including butyrate, which is thought by some to be protective against colon cancer. However, not all studies support a chemopreventive effect for butyrate and the lack of agreement (particularly between in vivo and in vitro studies) on butyrate and colon cancer has been termed the "butyrate paradox." There are a number of reasons for this discrepant effect including differences between the in vitro and in vivo environments, the timing of butyrate administration, the amount of butyrate administered, the source of butyrate (usually dietary fiber) as a potential confounder, and an interaction with dietary fat. Collectively, the studies suggest that the chemopreventive benefits of butyrate depend in part on amount, time of exposure with respect to the tumorigenic process, and the type of fat in the diet.
根据定义,所有膳食纤维都无法在小肠中被消化,因此相对完整地到达大肠。它在大肠中的命运取决于纤维的类型和结肠微生物群。高度可发酵的纤维会产生包括丁酸盐在内的短链脂肪酸,一些人认为丁酸盐对结肠癌具有保护作用。然而,并非所有研究都支持丁酸盐的化学预防作用,关于丁酸盐与结肠癌的研究结果缺乏一致性(尤其是体内和体外研究之间),这被称为“丁酸盐悖论”。造成这种差异效应的原因有很多,包括体外和体内环境的差异、丁酸盐给药的时间、丁酸盐的给药量、丁酸盐的来源(通常是膳食纤维)作为潜在混杂因素以及与膳食脂肪的相互作用。总体而言,研究表明丁酸盐的化学预防益处部分取决于其含量、相对于致癌过程的暴露时间以及饮食中脂肪的类型。