Enoka Roger M
Department of Integrative Physiology, University of Colorado at Boulder, USA.
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2004 Jan;32(1):1-3. doi: 10.1097/00003677-200401000-00001.
This commentary is the third in a series commemorating the 50th anniversary of the American College of Sports Medicine. The charge to the commentators was to provide insight on the origins and directions in the fields of physical activity and disease prevention (Haskell), applied exercise physiology (Wilmore), biomechanics and neuroscience (Enoka), and the physiology of exercise (Holloszy). In contrast to the innovation and vitality that characterizes the activities of the College in most of these fields, the inclusion of biomechanics and neuroscience as essential elements in realizing the mission of the College has been much less impressive. What we have here, as the saying goes, is a failure to communicate.
本评论是纪念美国运动医学学会成立50周年系列评论中的第三篇。评论员的任务是深入探讨身体活动与疾病预防领域(哈斯克尔)、应用运动生理学领域(威尔莫尔)、生物力学与神经科学领域(伊诺卡)以及运动生理学领域(霍洛西)的起源与发展方向。与该学会在上述大多数领域活动所具有的创新性与活力形成对比的是,将生物力学和神经科学纳入实现学会使命的基本要素方面,成果远没有那么显著。俗话说,我们这里存在沟通不畅的问题。