Suppr超能文献

高鼻音的直接量级估计和区间标度

Direct magnitude estimation and interval scaling of hypernasality.

作者信息

Whitehill Tara L, Lee Alice S Y, Chun Joyce C

机构信息

Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences, University of Hong Kong, 34 Hospital Road (5/F), Hong Kong.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002 Feb;45(1):80-8. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2002/006).

Abstract

Hypernasality is most commonly assessed using equal-appearing interval (EAI) scaling. Recently, the validity of EAI scaling for the evaluation of hypernasality has been questioned. The issue of validity rests on the psychophysical nature of the dimension to be rated. The purpose of this study was to compare EAI scaling with direct magnitude estimation (DME), in order to determine whether EAI scaling is a valid procedure for the evaluation of hypernasality. Connected speech samples from 20 individuals with repaired cleft palate and hypernasality were used. Twenty listeners undertook the listening tasks, which included EAI scaling, DME with modulus (DME-M), and DME without modulus (DME-WM). The results showed a curvilinear relationship between EAI and DME-M and between EAI and DME-WM, suggesting that EAI may not be a valid method for the evaluation of hypernasality; DME is recommended.

摘要

高鼻音最常使用等距量表(EAI)进行评估。最近,EAI量表在评估高鼻音方面的有效性受到了质疑。有效性问题取决于待评级维度的心理物理学性质。本研究的目的是将EAI量表与直接数量估计法(DME)进行比较,以确定EAI量表是否是评估高鼻音的有效方法。使用了20名腭裂修复且有高鼻音个体的连贯语音样本。20名听众承担了听力任务,包括EAI量表、带模数的直接数量估计法(DME-M)和不带模数的直接数量估计法(DME-WM)。结果显示EAI与DME-M以及EAI与DME-WM之间呈曲线关系,这表明EAI可能不是评估高鼻音的有效方法;建议使用DME。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验