Suppr超能文献

身心医学疗法的使用。

Use of mind-body medical therapies.

作者信息

Wolsko Peter M, Eisenberg David M, Davis Roger B, Phillips Russell S

机构信息

Division for Research and Education in Complementary and Integrative Medical Therapies, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Jan;19(1):43-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.21019.x.

Abstract

OBJECT

Research demonstrating connections between the mind and body has increased interest in the potential of mind-body therapies. Our aim was to examine the use of mind-body therapies, using data available from a national survey.

DESIGN

Analysis of a large nationally representative dataset that comprehensively evaluated the use of mind-body therapies in the last year.

SETTING

United States households.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 2055 American adults in 1997-1998.

INTERVENTIONS

Random national telephone survey.

MEASURES AND MAIN RESULTS

We obtained a 60% weighted overall response rate among eligible respondents. We found that 18.9% of adults had used at least 1 mind-body therapy in the last year, with 20.5% of these therapies involving visits to a mind-body professional. Meditation, imagery, and yoga were the most commonly used techniques. Factors independently and positively associated with the use of mind-body therapies in the last year were being 40 to 49 years old (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 2.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33 to 3.10), being not married (AOR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.34 to 2.36), having an educational level of college or greater (AOR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.57 to 3.09), having used self-prayer for a medical concern (AOR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.87 to 3.42), and having used another complementary medicine therapy in the last year (AOR, 3.77; 95% CI, 2.74 to 5.20). While used for the full array of medical conditions, they were used infrequently for chronic pain (used by 20% of those with chronic pain) and insomnia (used by 13% of those with insomnia), conditions for which consensus panels have concluded that mind-body therapies are effective. They were also used by less than 20% of those with heart disease, headaches, back or neck pain, and cancer, conditions for which there is strong research support. Mind-body therapies were generally used concomitantly with conventional care: 90% of those using a mind-body therapy in the last year had seen a physician and 80% of mind-body therapies used were discussed with a physician.

CONCLUSIONS

Although mind-body therapies were commonly used, much opportunity exists to increase use of mind-body therapies for indications with demonstrated efficacy.

摘要

目的

研究表明身心之间存在联系,这引发了人们对身心疗法潜力的更多关注。我们的目的是利用一项全国性调查中可得的数据,来研究身心疗法的使用情况。

设计

对一个具有全国代表性的大型数据集进行分析,该数据集全面评估了过去一年中身心疗法的使用情况。

背景

美国家庭。

患者/参与者:1997 - 1998年共有2055名美国成年人。

干预措施

全国随机电话调查。

测量指标及主要结果

在符合条件的受访者中,我们获得了60%的加权总回复率。我们发现,18.9%的成年人在过去一年中至少使用过一种身心疗法,其中20.5%的疗法涉及拜访身心治疗专业人员。冥想、意象和瑜伽是最常用的技巧。与过去一年中使用身心疗法独立且呈正相关的因素包括年龄在40至49岁之间(调整后的优势比[AOR]为2.03;95%置信区间[CI]为1.33至3.10)、未婚(AOR为1.78;95%CI为1.34至2.36)、教育水平为大学及以上(AOR为2.21;95%CI为1.57至3.09)、曾因医疗问题进行过自我祈祷(AOR为2.53;95%CI为1.87至3.42)以及在过去一年中使用过其他补充医学疗法(AOR为3.77;95%CI为2.74至5.20)。虽然身心疗法被用于各种医疗状况,但在慢性疼痛(慢性疼痛患者中有20%使用)和失眠(失眠患者中有13%使用)方面使用较少,而共识小组已得出结论认为身心疗法对这些病症有效。在心脏病、头痛、背部或颈部疼痛以及癌症患者中,使用身心疗法的比例也不到20%,而针对这些病症有强有力的研究支持。身心疗法通常与传统护理同时使用:过去一年中使用身心疗法的人中有90%看过医生,且所使用的身心疗法中有80%是与医生讨论过的。

结论

尽管身心疗法被广泛使用,但在已证明有疗效的适应症方面,增加身心疗法的使用仍有很大空间。

相似文献

1
Use of mind-body medical therapies.身心医学疗法的使用。
J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Jan;19(1):43-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.21019.x.

引用本文的文献

8
Exploring Non-pharmacological Methods for Pre-operative Pain Management.探索术前疼痛管理的非药物方法。
Front Surg. 2022 Mar 4;9:801742. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.801742. eCollection 2022.
9
Meditation: Evidence Map of Systematic Reviews.冥想:系统评价的证据图谱。
Front Public Health. 2021 Dec 2;9:742715. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.742715. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
3
Balancing safety of dietary supplements with the free market.平衡膳食补充剂的安全性与自由市场
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Apr 16;136(8):616-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-136-8-200204160-00011.
6
A critique on complementary and alternative medicine.对补充和替代医学的批判。
J Altern Complement Med. 2001;7 Suppl 1:S145-52. doi: 10.1089/107555301753393922.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验