Suppr超能文献

解决心理测试策略的变化:浅度空气潜水时氮麻醉的证据。

Change in strategy of solving psychological tests: evidence of nitrogen narcosis in shallow air-diving.

作者信息

Petri N M

机构信息

Department of Undersea and Hyperbaric Medicine, Naval Medical Institute, Split, Croatia.

出版信息

Undersea Hyperb Med. 2003 Winter;30(4):293-303.

Abstract

The depths from 10 to 30 m are usually not considered narcotic in scuba air-diving, and evidence of psychomotor disturbances attributable to nitrogen narcosis at these depths is weak and contradictory. 15 experienced male divers were tested in a chamber at 1, 2, 3, and 4 bars over five consecutive days using a battery of computer generated psychological tests-Computerized Reactionmeter Drenovac (CRD-series). Total test solving time, minimal single task solving time, total "ballast" time, and total number of errors were recorded. Nitrogen narcosis effects were evident at all hyperbaric pressures with marked performance differences among subjects. MANOVA revealed significant effects of nitrogen partial pressure for groups of the same variables as follows: total test solving time (p < 0.001), total "ballast" time (p < 0.001), and total number of errors (p = 0.038), but not for minimal single task solving time. ANOVA showed significant effects of pressure only on tests of visual discrimination of signal location (total test solving time: p = 0.012, total "ballast" time: p < 0.001), simple convergent visual orientation (total test solving time: p = 0.012), and convergent thinking (total test solving time: p = 0.002, total number of errors: p = 0.049). The order of the pressure exposures had no influence on subject performance. Impaired psychomotor processing found during air exposures from 2 to 4 bars suggests that nitrogen narcosis at depths usually considered safe from its effects might be a problem in underwater operations that require accuracy, speed, limited time of performance, and complex psychomotor skills.

摘要

在水肺潜水时,10至30米的深度通常不被认为会导致麻醉,而且在这些深度下,归因于氮麻醉的精神运动障碍证据薄弱且相互矛盾。15名经验丰富的男性潜水员连续五天在压力为1、2、3和4巴的舱室内接受测试,使用一系列计算机生成的心理测试——计算机化反应仪Drenovac(CRD系列)。记录了总测试解决时间、最小单任务解决时间、总“压载”时间和错误总数。在所有高压下,氮麻醉效应都很明显,不同受试者之间的表现存在显著差异。多变量方差分析显示,对于相同变量组,氮分压有显著影响,如下所示:总测试解决时间(p < 0.001)、总“压载”时间(p < 0.001)和错误总数(p = 0.038),但对最小单任务解决时间没有影响。方差分析表明,压力仅对信号位置视觉辨别测试(总测试解决时间:p = 0.012,总“压载”时间:p < 0.001)、简单会聚视觉定向(总测试解决时间:p = 0.012)和会聚思维(总测试解决时间:p = 0.002,错误总数:p = 0.049)有显著影响。压力暴露的顺序对受试者的表现没有影响。在2至4巴空气暴露期间发现的精神运动处理受损表明,在通常认为不会受其影响的安全深度下发生的氮麻醉,可能会成为水下作业中的一个问题,因为这些作业需要准确性、速度、有限的执行时间和复杂的精神运动技能。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验