Calbo Esther, Ochoa de Echagüen Anna, Rodríguez-Carballeira Mónica, Ferrer Carles, Garau Javier
Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Mútua de Terrassa, Barcelona, España.
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2004 Feb;22(2):64-9. doi: 10.1016/s0213-005x(04)73036-0.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the management of community acquired pneumonia (CAP) according to conventional clinical criteria applied in the emergency room as compared to a pneumonia prognosis index (PPI) (Fine et al. NEJM 1997). We also analyzed which factors were associated with the need for inpatient treatment in PPI risk category III patients.
We prospectively enrolled all adults with CAP seen in the emergency room during 1999. The data required to calculate the PPI were collected at admission. Mortality and length of stay were recorded at discharge.
A total of 447 patients with CAP were collected, 55.7% in the high-risk classes IV and V. Twenty-seven patients died (6.1%) and 97% of these were within the high-risk classes. There were 362 hospitalizations; 302 (83%) were classes III, IV and V. The readmission rate increased with increases in the risk class, with a range of 4% for class I to 18% for class IV. Eighty-five patients (19%) were treated on an outpatient basis. Risk class III included 80 patients; 63 (79%) were hospitalized, with a length of stay of 7.89 days. The factor most highly associated with hospitalization in this group was abnormal findings on physical examination or on laboratory testing and radiographic studies. (OR: 7.62 [1.5-35.2]).
In our cohort, the PPI was effective for identifying low-risk patients with CAP who could be treated as outpatients. In risk class III patients, the severity of the disease was the strongest predictor of hospitalization, rather than the presence of comorbid conditions.
本研究的目的是评估根据急诊室应用的传统临床标准管理社区获得性肺炎(CAP)与肺炎预后指数(PPI)(Fine等人,《新英格兰医学杂志》,1997年)相比的情况。我们还分析了哪些因素与PPI风险类别III患者的住院治疗需求相关。
我们前瞻性地纳入了1999年在急诊室就诊的所有成年CAP患者。入院时收集计算PPI所需的数据。出院时记录死亡率和住院时间。
共收集了447例CAP患者,其中55.7%属于高风险的IV级和V级。27例患者死亡(6.1%),其中97%属于高风险类别。有362例住院治疗;302例(83%)属于III级、IV级和V级。再入院率随着风险类别的增加而增加,I级为4%,IV级为18%。85例患者(19%)接受门诊治疗。风险类别III包括80例患者;63例(79%)住院,住院时间为7.89天。该组中与住院最相关的因素是体格检查、实验室检查和影像学研究的异常结果。(比值比:7.62[1.5 - 35.2])。
在我们的队列中,PPI对于识别可作为门诊治疗的低风险CAP患者有效。在风险类别III的患者中,疾病的严重程度是住院的最强预测因素,而非合并症的存在。