Suppr超能文献

[一种用于侵袭性念珠菌病血清学诊断的新型商业检测方法(白色念珠菌免疫荧光抗体IgG检测)的评估]

[Evaluation of a new commercial test (Candida albicans IFA IgG) for the serodiagnosis of invasive candidiasis].

作者信息

Moragues María Dolores, Ortiz Natalia, Iruretagoyena José Ramón, García-Ruiz Juan Carlos, Amutio Elena, Rojas Almudena, Mendoza Joaquín, Quindós Guillermo, Pontón-San Emeterio José

机构信息

Departamento de Enfermería I, Facultad de Medicina y Odontología, Universidad del País Vasco, Bilbao, Vizcaya, España.

出版信息

Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2004 Feb;22(2):83-8. doi: 10.1016/s0213-005x(04)73039-6.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Two tests for the detection of antibodies to Candida albicans germ tubes in patients with invasive candidiasis were compared: a new commercially available test (Candida albicans IFA IgG) and the indirect immunofluorescence test generally used for this purpose.

METHODS

With the use of two indirect immunofluorescence tests, retrospective study was done on 172 sera from 51 patients classified into two groups: Group I included 123 serum samples from 32 patients with invasive candidiasis, and Group II, the control, included 49 serum samples from 19 patients with no evidence of Candida infection.

RESULTS

In Group I, 84% of patients presented anti-germ tube antibody titers >or= 1:160 by the Candida albicans IFA IgG test and 78.1% of patients were positive by the generally used test. There was a high correlation between the two tests (R2 =0.9512 by patients; R2 = 0.8986 by sera). When a titer value of >or= 1:160 was used as cutoff, the Candida albicans IFA IgG test showed a sensitivity of 84.4% and a specificity of 94.7%, whereas the traditional test showed a sensitivity of 78.1% and a specificity of 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

The commercially available Candida albicans IFA IgG test is similar to the test generally used for the detection of antibodies to C. albicans germ tubes and provides faster and easier diagnosis of invasive candidiasis in the clinical microbiology laboratory.

摘要

引言

对两种用于检测侵袭性念珠菌病患者抗白色念珠菌芽管抗体的检测方法进行了比较:一种新的市售检测方法(白色念珠菌免疫荧光法IgG)和通常用于此目的的间接免疫荧光检测法。

方法

使用两种间接免疫荧光检测法,对来自51例患者的172份血清进行回顾性研究,这些患者分为两组:第一组包括来自32例侵袭性念珠菌病患者的123份血清样本,第二组为对照组,包括来自19例无念珠菌感染证据患者的49份血清样本。

结果

在第一组中,通过白色念珠菌免疫荧光法IgG检测,84%的患者抗芽管抗体滴度≥1:160,而通过通常使用的检测法,78.1%的患者呈阳性。两种检测方法之间存在高度相关性(患者的R2 = 0.9512;血清的R2 = 0.8986)。当以≥1:160的滴度值作为临界值时,白色念珠菌免疫荧光法IgG检测显示敏感性为84.4%,特异性为94.7%,而传统检测法显示敏感性为78.1%,特异性为100%。

结论

市售的白色念珠菌免疫荧光法IgG检测与通常用于检测抗白色念珠菌芽管抗体的检测方法相似,并且在临床微生物实验室中能够更快、更简便地诊断侵袭性念珠菌病。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验