使用两种不同方法评估大鼠胫前肌腱力学性能的比较。
Comparison of mechanical properties of rat tibialis anterior tendon evaluated using two different approaches.
作者信息
Wu John Z, Brumfield Anne, Miller Gerald R, Metheny Rebecca, Cutlip Robert G
机构信息
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA.
出版信息
Biomed Mater Eng. 2004;14(1):13-22.
Tendon injuries may result in variations of its mechanical properties. The published data of the tendon stiffness of small animals, such as mouse and rat, are exclusively obtained by measuring grip-to-grip (g-t-g) displacement. Local strain concentration and relative sliding of the specimens in the clamps might significantly affect the measured tendon deformation. In the present study, the mechanical properties of the rat tibialis anterior tendon measured using the proposed tendon mark method were compared to those evaluated using the g-t-g displacement method. Five male Sprague Dawley rats ( approximately 418 g) were used in this study. For the proposed method, reference marks were made on the tendons using permanent ink. A microscope video system was customized to observe and record the tendon deformation. Pattern recognition software was developed to obtain the displacement time-histories of the reference marks. The distance between the grips was approximately 7 mm; and the distance between the reference marks used for the data processing was approximately 5 mm. The cross-section areas of the specimens were measured using a custom-made slot gauge and by applying a constant compressive stress (0.15 MPa). The tendons were clamped between two custom-made metal grips and stretched on a testing machine at a constant speed (1 mm/s) up to failure. Throughout the tests, the tendon specimens were submerged in a PBS bath at 22 degrees C. The deformation of the specimens was evaluated using the g-t-g displacement method and the proposed method. The stress/strain curves obtained by using the g-t-g displacement can be characterized by an initial toe zone, a quasi-linear zone, and a final failure stage. The stress/strain curves determined using the proposed method are quite different from those obtained using the g-t-g displacement: it has a smaller toe zone and a stress-hardening transition, over which the tendon stiffness increases dramatically with the increasing strain. The tendon stiffness measured by using the g-t-g displacement method may underestimate the actual mechanical properties of tendon by approximately 43%.
肌腱损伤可能会导致其力学性能发生变化。已发表的关于小鼠和大鼠等小动物肌腱刚度的数据完全是通过测量夹距(g-t-g)位移获得的。标本在夹具中的局部应变集中和相对滑动可能会显著影响所测量的肌腱变形。在本研究中,将使用所提出的肌腱标记法测量的大鼠胫前肌腱的力学性能与使用夹距位移法评估的力学性能进行了比较。本研究使用了5只雄性斯普拉格-道利大鼠(约418克)。对于所提出的方法,使用永久性墨水在肌腱上制作参考标记。定制了一个显微镜视频系统来观察和记录肌腱变形。开发了模式识别软件以获取参考标记的位移时间历程。夹具之间的距离约为7毫米;用于数据处理的参考标记之间的距离约为5毫米。使用定制的槽规并施加恒定压应力(0.15兆帕)来测量标本的横截面积。将肌腱夹在两个定制的金属夹具之间,并在试验机上以恒定速度(1毫米/秒)拉伸直至断裂。在整个测试过程中,肌腱标本浸没在22摄氏度的磷酸盐缓冲盐水浴中。使用夹距位移法和所提出的方法评估标本的变形。使用夹距位移法获得的应力/应变曲线的特征在于初始趾区、准线性区和最终破坏阶段。使用所提出的方法确定的应力/应变曲线与使用夹距位移法获得的曲线有很大不同:它具有较小的趾区和应力硬化转变,在此转变过程中,肌腱刚度随着应变的增加而急剧增加。使用夹距位移法测量的肌腱刚度可能会低估肌腱的实际力学性能约43%。