• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学专业精神对科学实践的影响。

The influence of medical professionalism on scientific practice.

作者信息

Kirk-Smith Michael D, Stretch David D

机构信息

The University of Ulster, Newtonabbey, Northern Ireland, UK.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2003 Nov;9(4):417-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00360.x.

DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00360.x
PMID:14758964
Abstract

This paper examines how the practise of science in medicine may be subverted by the professionalism of medicine. The requirements of science as regards the axiom of the burden of proof and research design may be inevitably entangled with the influence of authority. This entanglement may be particularly strong in medical research because of the way the profession works and is organized. The nature and possible effects of this entanglement are explored by examining the cultural differences between scientists and professionals and their approach to authority. Then the nature of the axiom of burdens of proof and research design are described, followed by accompanying discussions of how aspects of authority and professional organization may influence them. Finally, concluding comments address ways forward.

摘要

本文探讨医学中的科学实践如何可能被医学的专业性所颠覆。科学在举证责任公理和研究设计方面的要求可能不可避免地与权威的影响纠缠在一起。由于医学专业的工作方式和组织形式,这种纠缠在医学研究中可能尤为强烈。通过审视科学家和专业人员之间的文化差异及其对待权威的方式,来探究这种纠缠的性质和可能产生的影响。接着描述举证责任公理和研究设计的性质,随后讨论权威和专业组织的各个方面可能如何对它们产生影响。最后,结语部分阐述了前进的方向。

相似文献

1
The influence of medical professionalism on scientific practice.医学专业精神对科学实践的影响。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2003 Nov;9(4):417-22. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.2003.00360.x.
2
Scientific knowledge in medicine: a new clinical epistemology?医学中的科学知识:一种新的临床认识论?
J Eval Clin Pract. 1997 Apr;3(2):133-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2753.1997.00075.x.
3
Medical ideologies in conflict.
Med Care. 1975 Nov;13(11):905-14. doi: 10.1097/00005650-197511000-00003.
4
Medical professionalism: a Parsonian view.医学专业精神:帕森斯的观点。
Mt Sinai J Med. 2002 Nov;69(6):363-9.
5
Evidence for practice and the authority of experts: there can be no former without the latter: a commentary an Nunn (2008).
J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):679-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2008.01069.x.
6
Physician views on practicing professionalism in the corporate age.
Qual Health Res. 2000 Jul;10(4):490-506. doi: 10.1177/104973200129118598.
7
[The complex interplay between health services administration, health professionals and patients. A challenge to take up].
Recenti Prog Med. 2013 Feb;104(2):49-53. doi: 10.1701/1241.13703.
8
Who's afraid of EBM? Medical professionalism from the perspective of evidence-based medicine.谁害怕循证医学?从循证医学角度看医学职业精神。
Med Health Care Philos. 2017 Mar;20(1):61-66. doi: 10.1007/s11019-016-9726-1.
9
Deference and decision-making in science and society: How deference to scientific authority goes beyond confidence in science and scientists to become authoritarianism.科学与社会中的尊重与决策:科学权威的尊重如何超越对科学和科学家的信心,进而演变成威权主义。
Public Underst Sci. 2020 Nov;29(8):800-818. doi: 10.1177/0963662520962741. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
10
The role of nursing unit culture in shaping research utilization behaviors.护理单元文化在塑造研究应用行为中的作用。
Res Nurs Health. 2008 Aug;31(4):298-309. doi: 10.1002/nur.20264.

引用本文的文献

1
The reliability and validity of a new professionalism assessment scale for young health care workers.一种针对年轻医护人员的新型职业素养评估量表的信效度研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2017 Jun;96(25):e7058. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007058.