Suppr超能文献

尿液筛查在年轻成年人群体中的价值。

The value of urine screening in a young adult population.

作者信息

Topham Peter S, Jethwa Ashok, Watkins Maggie, Rees Yvonne, Feehally John

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Leicester General Hospital, Leicester, UK.

出版信息

Fam Pract. 2004 Feb;21(1):18-21. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh105.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

GPs in England and Wales are required to perform screening urinalysis on all newly registered patients. The value of this practice, however, is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify the prevalence of persistent urine abnormalities and to establish the added value of screening for both haematuria and proteinuria in a large cohort of young adults in the UK.

METHODS

Urine screening was carried out in a cohort of young adults in a student health centre and a university hospital nephrology unit in a large British city. University students enrolling for health screening in a university health centre over a 2-year period were tested for haematuria and/or proteinuria by dipstick urinalysis. Subjects with persistent urine abnormalities were evaluated for the presence of significant renal tract pathology.

RESULTS

Of 3808 students screened, 3570 provided an initial urine sample; 220 were abnormal. Of these, 38 (1% of original cohort) had persistent abnormalities (haematuria, 14; proteinuria, 16; both, eight). Subjects with isolated haematuria or proteinuria did not have significant pathology. In contrast, all the students with both haematuria and proteinuria had identifiable renal disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings do not support the value of routine screening for proteinuria or haematuria in young adults. However, the combination of haematuria and proteinuria is a powerful predictor for parenchymal renal disease. Thus, if proteinuria is detected, further testing for haematuria should be performed.

摘要

背景

英格兰和威尔士的全科医生被要求对所有新登记的患者进行尿液筛查分析。然而,这种做法的价值尚不清楚。

目的

本研究的目的是确定持续性尿液异常的患病率,并确定在英国一大群年轻人中筛查血尿和蛋白尿的附加价值。

方法

在英国一个大城市的学生健康中心和大学医院肾病科对一群年轻人进行尿液筛查。在两年期间在大学健康中心报名参加健康筛查的大学生通过试纸条尿液分析检测血尿和/或蛋白尿。对持续性尿液异常的受试者评估是否存在明显的泌尿系统病理情况。

结果

在3808名接受筛查的学生中,3570人提供了初始尿液样本;220人异常。其中,38人(占原始队列的1%)有持续性异常(血尿14人;蛋白尿16人;两者皆有8人)。孤立性血尿或蛋白尿的受试者没有明显的病理情况。相比之下,所有血尿和蛋白尿兼具的学生都有可识别的肾脏疾病。

结论

我们的研究结果不支持对年轻人进行蛋白尿或血尿常规筛查的价值。然而,血尿和蛋白尿的组合是实质性肾脏疾病的有力预测指标。因此,如果检测到蛋白尿,应进一步检测血尿。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验