Raff Rudolf A, Love Alan C
Indiana Molecular Biology Institute and Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA.
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2004 Jan 15;302(1):19-34. doi: 10.1002/jez.b.20004.
Alexander Kowalevsky was one of the most significant 19th century biologists working at the intersection of evolution and embryology. The reinstatement of the Alexander Kowalevsky Medal by the St. Petersburg Society of Naturalists for outstanding contributions to understanding evolutionary relationships in the animal kingdom, evolutionary developmental biology, and comparative zoology is timely now that Evo-devo has emerged as a major research discipline in contemporary biology. Consideration of the intellectual lineage of comparative evolutionary embryology explicitly forces a reconsideration of some current conceptions of the modern emergence of Evo-devo, which has tended to exist in the shadow of experimental embryology throughout the 20th century, especially with respect to the recent success of developmental biology and developmental genetics. In particular we advocate a sharper distinction between the heritage of problems and the heritage of tools for contemporary Evo-devo. We provide brief overviews of the work of N. J. Berrill and D. T. Anderson to illustrate comparative evolutionary embryology in the 20th century, which provides an appropriate contextualization for a conceptual review of our research on the sea urchin genus Heliocidaris over the past two decades. We conclude that keeping research questions rather than experimental capabilities at the forefront of Evo-devo may be an antidote to any repeat of the stagnation experienced by the first group of evolutionary developmental biologists over one hundred years ago and acknowledges Kowalevsky's legacy in evolutionary embryology.
亚历山大·科瓦列夫斯基是19世纪最重要的生物学家之一,他的研究领域处于进化与胚胎学的交叉点。圣彼得堡自然主义者协会恢复颁发亚历山大·科瓦列夫斯基奖章,以表彰在理解动物王国进化关系、进化发育生物学和比较动物学方面的杰出贡献,鉴于进化发育生物学已成为当代生物学的一门主要研究学科,这一举措恰逢其时。对比较进化胚胎学知识谱系的思考明确促使人们重新审视当前一些关于进化发育生物学现代起源的观念,在整个20世纪,进化发育生物学往往处于实验胚胎学的阴影之下,尤其是考虑到发育生物学和发育遗传学最近所取得的成功。特别是,我们主张当代进化发育生物学应更明确地区分问题传承和工具传承。我们简要概述了N. J. 贝里尔和D. T. 安德森的工作,以阐释20世纪的比较进化胚胎学,这为我们对过去二十年海胆属Heliocidaris的研究进行概念性回顾提供了适当的背景。我们得出结论,将研究问题而非实验能力置于进化发育生物学的前沿,可能是防止重演一百多年前第一批进化发育生物学家所经历的停滞状态的一剂良方,同时也承认了科瓦列夫斯基在进化胚胎学方面的遗产。