Levit Georgy S
AG Biologiedidaktik/Ernst-Haeckel-Haus, Berggasse 7, 07745, Jena, Germany.
Theory Biosci. 2007 Dec;126(4):131-48. doi: 10.1007/s12064-007-0013-9. Epub 2007 Nov 6.
This paper raises the general question of whether there are any national peculiarities that characterize the scientific and philosophical roots of Russian-language evolutionary developmental biology. The researchers and theories are surveyed which, with hindsight, have been crucial for the Russian tradition when it comes to general methodological principles and constituting concepts. Based on published works and archival documents the main concepts of the "founding fathers" of the Russian tradition with their "Western analogues" are compared. The focus is on A. O. Kowalevsky (1840-1901), I. I. Metschnikov (1945-1916), A. N. Sewertzoff (1866-1936), I. I. Schmalhausen (1884-1963) and the parallelisms between them and E. Haeckel (1834-1919), V. Franz (1883-1950), and C. H. Waddington (1905-1977). In addition, the problem of specific influences constituting the Russian-language context of the Modern Synthesis is addressed. The major thesis of this paper is that the very character of the Russian developmental biology and its intellectual environment predisposed a strong bias towards environmentalist interpretations and thus anticipated what we now call "ecological developmental biology".
本文提出了一个一般性问题,即是否存在任何民族特性来表征俄语进化发育生物学的科学和哲学根源。文中对一些研究人员和理论进行了综述,事后看来,这些研究人员和理论在一般方法论原则和构成概念方面对俄罗斯传统起到了关键作用。基于已发表的著作和档案文件,将俄罗斯传统的“奠基人”的主要概念与其“西方类似概念”进行了比较。重点关注了A. O. 科瓦列夫斯基(1840 - 1901)、I. I. 梅奇尼科夫(1845 - 1916)、A. N. 谢韦尔佐夫(1866 - 1936)、I. I. 施马尔豪森(1884 - 1963)以及他们与E. 海克尔(1834 - 1919)、V. 弗兰兹(1883 - 1950)和C. H. 沃丁顿(1905 - 1977)之间的相似之处。此外,还探讨了构成现代综合理论俄语语境的特定影响问题。本文的主要论点是,俄语发育生物学的本质及其知识环境使其强烈倾向于环境主义解释,从而预见了我们现在所说的“生态发育生物学”。