Tokuhisa T, Oyama K, Tamaki R, Kitahara K
Department of Ophthalmology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Minato-ku, Japan.
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 1992 Nov;96(11):1429-32.
The authors studied the differences between the automated static perimetry of high-pass resolution perimeter (HRP) and the kinetic perimetry of the Goldmann perimeter in 12 patients with retinitis pigmentosa. In a total of 10 eyes of 6 patients, we found 19 quadrants in which the patients were not able to recognize the largest ring target even when the target was within the isopter of the Goldmann perimetry. Also, there were 10 quadrants in which the largest target was not recognized in a total of 6 eyes of 4 patients even though their visual field showed symmetrical isopter in upper and lower or right and left quadrants in the Goldmann perimetry. As a result, it was suggested that the causes of the dissocation were a greater decrease in sensitivity for the low spatial frequency target than the high spatial frequency target and/or a greater decrease in resolution sensitivity than light sensitivity in retinitis pigmentosa.
作者研究了12例视网膜色素变性患者的高通分辨率视野计(HRP)自动静态视野检查与戈德曼视野计动态视野检查之间的差异。在6例患者的总共10只眼中,我们发现有19个象限,即使目标位于戈德曼视野计的等视线内,患者也无法识别最大的环形目标。此外,在4例患者的总共6只眼中,有10个象限无法识别最大目标,尽管他们的视野在戈德曼视野计的上下或左右象限显示出对称的等视线。结果表明,分离的原因是视网膜色素变性中对低空间频率目标的敏感度下降幅度大于高空间频率目标,和/或分辨敏感度下降幅度大于光敏感度。