Ravich R
Northside Center for Child Development, New York.
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 1992;28(2):161-7.
After less than four decades, the field of family therapy has largely abandoned the search for a typology of interaction between persons or between groups. Granted no single typology can conceivably fathom the hyper-dimensionality of human interaction. However, mankind's earliest recorded efforts to explicate the structures of human family systems are perceived by examining two of the earliest books known to man. These documents, The Book of Genesis of The Old Testament and the ancient Chinese Book of Changes or I Ching, can be viewed as loosely integrated modules of a single framework that help explain one another. The author suggests that these linked, family oriented sources also were the basis of modern symbolic logic and information (or switching) theory. Together they can provide the foundation of a hyper-dimensional meta-typology of human interaction. This could integrate interactions at and between levels of neuronal synapses and networks, the cerebral hemispheres, self and other, family and disparate social systems, and various human groups, national, racial, ethnic or religious.
在不到四十年的时间里,家庭治疗领域在很大程度上放弃了对人与人或群体间互动类型学的探索。诚然,没有任何一种单一的类型学能够想象地理解人类互动的超维度性。然而,通过审视人类最早记载的两本书籍,可以洞察到人类最早阐释人类家庭系统结构的努力。这两本书,即《旧约全书》中的《创世纪》和中国古代的《易经》,可以被视为一个单一框架中松散整合的模块,它们相互阐释。作者认为,这些相互关联、以家庭为导向的源头也是现代符号逻辑和信息(或开关)理论的基础。它们共同能够为人类互动的超维度元类型学提供基础。这可以整合神经元突触和网络、大脑半球、自我与他人、家庭与不同社会系统以及各种人类群体(国家、种族、民族或宗教群体)层面及之间的互动。