Malagoli Togliatti M
Facoltà di Psicologia, Università degli Studi La Sapienza, Rome, Italy.
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 1992;28(2):215-9.
With Bateson we want to look for the structure that connects form, process and typology. We do not believe that distinctions are representation of dualism: according to the model proposed by the Second Cybernetics, the distinctions are considered as different sides, that is, an overlap of levels in which one term derives from the other. The logic of the relationship between form and process implies different levels in a self-reference model in which one part is pulled out of the other. At present, speaking about typology, makes sense in order to correlate some complex factors. The first one implies the multidimensionality of intrapsychic and relational reality. The second, a continuous process of self-consciousness of different analytic levels of "reality". The third considers a diagnosis (and typology) as a part of the "information" for the therapist, his patient, his family and his interpersonal context.
与贝特森一样,我们想要探寻连接形式、过程和类型学的结构。我们不认为区分是二元论的表现:根据二阶控制论提出的模型,区分被视为不同的方面,也就是说,是层次的重叠,其中一个术语源自另一个术语。形式与过程之间关系的逻辑意味着在一个自我指涉模型中的不同层次,在这个模型中一部分从另一部分中分离出来。目前,谈及类型学,为了关联一些复杂因素是有意义的。第一个因素意味着心理内部和关系现实的多维性。第二个因素是不同分析层次的“现实”的自我意识的持续过程。第三个因素将诊断(和类型学)视为治疗师、他的患者、他的家庭以及他的人际环境的“信息”的一部分。